flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Buildings with rocking steel-braced frames are advantageous in earthquakes

Codes and Standards

Buildings with rocking steel-braced frames are advantageous in earthquakes

Research could have implications for seismic codes


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | February 18, 2015
Buildings with rocking steel-braced frames are advantageous in earthquakes

Photo: Thester11 via Wikimedia Commons

Research at Case Western Reserve University has found that buildings that rock during an earthquake and return to plumb would withstand seismic shaking better than structural designs commonly used today in vulnerable zones of California and elsewhere.

Those buildings would also be more easily and cheaply repaired and could be put back into use faster, said Michael Pollino, an assistant civil engineering professor at Case School of Engineering. The computer model research suggests optimal sizes for damping devices and steel yielding devices that dissipate the energy of a quake.

Pollino’s model compares rocking steel-braced frames to current earthquake standards used in low- to mid-rise buildings. "Currently, engineers are designing low-rise structures for an earthquake that has a 10% chance of occurring in a 50-year-lifetime," Pollino said. "We accept there will be damage, but no collapse or loss of life. But what about an event that has a 50% chance of occurring? You may still have to tear the building down afterward.”

Pollino and other researchers are finding advantages to the design, which has not yet made it into practice. He and colleagues are discussing forming a technical committee of civil engineers that would advance the technology into practice. Pollino is now applying for funding to begin physically testing designs in the university's structures laboratory. 

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jan 11, 2021

HUD releases new Fair Housing Act design and construction requirements

First update of ‘safe harbors’ in 15 years provides better clarity for design and construction firms.

Codes and Standards | Jan 8, 2021

Court ruling gives UpCodes upper hand in fight over building codes database

Battle over IP property claims by ICC and other codes bodies continues.

Codes and Standards | Jan 8, 2021

Houston creates tax incentives for green stormwater elements

Businesses that install green roofs, rain gardens, permeable pavement, and rainwater harvesting are eligible.

Codes and Standards | Jan 7, 2021

Trump’s classical design aesthetic mandate for federal buildings likely to be felt for years

May limit the number of firms that could compete for contracts.

Codes and Standards | Jan 7, 2021

Workers on some of Virginia’s major construction projects sue subcontractors for wage theft

Projects include new General Assembly Building, outpatient facility at Virginia Commonwealth University.

Codes and Standards | Jan 5, 2021

EPA finalizes first major update to Lead and Copper rule

Will accelerate pace of lead service line replacement.

Codes and Standards | Jan 5, 2021

Flood risk for affordable housing expected to triple by 2050

Some communities will have 90% of their affordable housing at risk.

Codes and Standards | Jan 4, 2021

Ranks of remote workers expected to double in five years

Nearly 23% of employees will work from outside of offices.

Codes and Standards | Dec 28, 2020

CSI and ASTM standards can now be connected through a central location

CROSSWALK web service accesses standards specific to projects from feasibility to turnover.

Codes and Standards | Dec 28, 2020

Dept. of Energy offers Better Buildings Field Validation Results Hub

One-stop-shop for information associated with technology validations in buildings.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021