flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Buildings with rocking steel-braced frames are advantageous in earthquakes

Codes and Standards

Buildings with rocking steel-braced frames are advantageous in earthquakes

Research could have implications for seismic codes


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | February 18, 2015
Buildings with rocking steel-braced frames are advantageous in earthquakes

Photo: Thester11 via Wikimedia Commons

Research at Case Western Reserve University has found that buildings that rock during an earthquake and return to plumb would withstand seismic shaking better than structural designs commonly used today in vulnerable zones of California and elsewhere.

Those buildings would also be more easily and cheaply repaired and could be put back into use faster, said Michael Pollino, an assistant civil engineering professor at Case School of Engineering. The computer model research suggests optimal sizes for damping devices and steel yielding devices that dissipate the energy of a quake.

Pollino’s model compares rocking steel-braced frames to current earthquake standards used in low- to mid-rise buildings. "Currently, engineers are designing low-rise structures for an earthquake that has a 10% chance of occurring in a 50-year-lifetime," Pollino said. "We accept there will be damage, but no collapse or loss of life. But what about an event that has a 50% chance of occurring? You may still have to tear the building down afterward.”

Pollino and other researchers are finding advantages to the design, which has not yet made it into practice. He and colleagues are discussing forming a technical committee of civil engineers that would advance the technology into practice. Pollino is now applying for funding to begin physically testing designs in the university's structures laboratory. 

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jan 10, 2022

New ratings services focus on climate risk for homeowners

Efficacy of models used in risk assessment varies.

Codes and Standards | Jan 6, 2022

Virginia contractors having a tough time finding diverse subs to meet state goals

Survey of primes may indicate similar issues at federal level.

Codes and Standards | Jan 5, 2022

Boston drops parking requirements for affordable housing

Measure expected to spur new projects.

Codes and Standards | Jan 4, 2022

Dept. of Energy Better Climate Challenge aims for 50% GHG emission reduction by 2030

Program offers technical assistance and peer-to-peer knowledge sharing.

Codes and Standards | Jan 4, 2022

Architects at New York firm take steps to unionize

Support for unionization reported at two other New York firms.

Codes and Standards | Jan 3, 2022

Biden’s executive order for a carbon-neutral government includes green materials mandate

As a driver of demand, federal procurement impact could ripple through the economy.

Codes and Standards | Jan 3, 2022

Controversial California solar power incentive proposal would reduce subsidies

Plan intended to encourage customers to install power storage systems.

Codes and Standards | Jan 3, 2022

New York City bans new gas hookups

Applies to gas stoves, boilers, and heaters in new buildings and buildings that undergo gut renovations.

Codes and Standards | Jan 3, 2022

New engineering guide on fire safety for very tall buildings released

Topics include emergency egress, fire resistance, building envelope, suppression, detection, alarms, and smoke control.

Codes and Standards | Dec 22, 2021

Updated ASCE 7-22 standard includes first-ever criteria for tornado-resistant design

New document provides up-to-date, coordinated loading provisions for general structural design.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021