flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Buildings with rocking steel-braced frames are advantageous in earthquakes

Codes and Standards

Buildings with rocking steel-braced frames are advantageous in earthquakes

Research could have implications for seismic codes


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | February 18, 2015
Buildings with rocking steel-braced frames are advantageous in earthquakes

Photo: Thester11 via Wikimedia Commons

Research at Case Western Reserve University has found that buildings that rock during an earthquake and return to plumb would withstand seismic shaking better than structural designs commonly used today in vulnerable zones of California and elsewhere.

Those buildings would also be more easily and cheaply repaired and could be put back into use faster, said Michael Pollino, an assistant civil engineering professor at Case School of Engineering. The computer model research suggests optimal sizes for damping devices and steel yielding devices that dissipate the energy of a quake.

Pollino’s model compares rocking steel-braced frames to current earthquake standards used in low- to mid-rise buildings. "Currently, engineers are designing low-rise structures for an earthquake that has a 10% chance of occurring in a 50-year-lifetime," Pollino said. "We accept there will be damage, but no collapse or loss of life. But what about an event that has a 50% chance of occurring? You may still have to tear the building down afterward.”

Pollino and other researchers are finding advantages to the design, which has not yet made it into practice. He and colleagues are discussing forming a technical committee of civil engineers that would advance the technology into practice. Pollino is now applying for funding to begin physically testing designs in the university's structures laboratory. 

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jan 7, 2019

Program uses low-cost sensors to monitor impact of stormwater mitigation systems

University/municipal partnership in Philadelphia aims to improve green infrastructure design.

Codes and Standards | Jan 7, 2019

Washington, D.C., to transition to 100% renewable energy by 2032

Includes measures to reduce emissions from buildings and transportation.

Codes and Standards | Jan 4, 2019

Canada’s National Building Code will include climate change obligations

New durability requirements for new buildings in the works.

Codes and Standards | Jan 4, 2019

LEED v4.1 beta registration begins in January

First releases are O+M, BD+C, and ID+C.

Codes and Standards | Jan 3, 2019

U.S. Appeals Court says general contractors can be cited for subcontractor violations

Ruling will prompt review of OSH decision that said GCs cannot be held liable for subs’ violations.

Codes and Standards | Jan 3, 2019

Tall mass timber code changes receive final approval

New provisions to be included in the 2021 International Building Code.

Codes and Standards | Jan 2, 2019

ASHRAE’s Low-Rise Residential Buildings standard update now available

Performance measures are at least 50% more efficient than 2006 IECC.

Codes and Standards | Jan 2, 2019

Study compares labor hours for various low-slope roofing options

Type of roof covering, project parameters, tool management, and crew efficiency all impact profitability.

Codes and Standards | Dec 20, 2018

New York’s ‘Scaffold Law’ under fire for driving up project costs

Lawmakers under pressure to reform law that makes contractors 100% liable for work-site injuries.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021