Georgia Tech always intended its new energy science facility to be a sustainable building. The project was envisioned as a living lab, embodying the high performance goals that would be explored by the researchers inside. The school needed an adaptable space to accommodate unknown users, scientific techniques, and equipment. A fairly simple high-bay box was the initial plan.
Midway through schematic design, the client heard about a promising construction-grant competition being run by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Tech halted its project and applied for a grant with the active assistance of its design-build team, including
architect/engineer HDR Inc. and construction manager Gilbane Building Co. The process delayed the job by a year but eventually added $11.6 million to the budget, allowing the school to shoot for a net-zero facility worthy of the name āCarbon-Neutral Energy Solutions Laboratory.ā
NISTās stipulations required the team to adopt a more fast-track, āIPD-lightā approach, but also encouraged a more ambitious design. Because all significant team members had been hired early, relationships were already well-established, making a freewheeling exchange of ideas more fruitful.
Ā
The shop-like, flexible high-bay lab space accommodates industrial-scale fabrication experiments. Accessible utility trenches in the slab allow unobstructed operation of the industrial crane.
Ā
āThe original thought was that this would be a low-tech building done fairly quickly, flexibly, and inexpensively,ā says HDR Design Principal Dan Rew, AIA. āBut when the project became more ambitious, Georgia Tech became the driver for an attempt at net-zero. The campus already had a lot of sustainable projects, which helped. Our discussions with Gilbane about constructability, and their previous efforts at creating energy-efficient buildings, including some net- zero projects they were already working on, also helped.ā
In addition, Georgia Techās Director of Capital Planning and Space Management, Howard S. Wertheimer, FAIA, LEED AP, was an unusually well-informed and imaginative decision maker. In previous work as a private-sector architect, Wertheimer had designed many complex science buildings himself.
āWe already had several science buildings on campus, and because I personally had done many others around the country, there was already a high level of understanding about what this project needed to be,ā he says. āThis project offered a good opportunity to push the upper limit, and Dan and [Gilbaneās project manager] Paul Stewart brought us some broader perspectives.ā Wertheimer also credits valuable input from Techās Planning and Design Commission, consisting of external architects and landscape architects who visit the campus quarterly.
Upgrading the plan to achieve more versatile performance
Eventually the team agreed that the project would benefit from a revised program, not just more sophisticated sustainability tactics. Three space typologies were developed: the original high-bay āboxā for industrial-scale work; mid-bay labs for science requiring smaller equipment but more stringent environmental control; and office-like computational labs, stacked above the mid-bay labs. This versatility would allow the school to tackle a wide range of projects, including work in combustion, gasification, biochemical-enzymatic conversion of biomass, and CO2 capture.
The Building Team developed specs for temperatures, humidity levels, and ventilation for each lab type, favoring passive design where possible.Ā Under-floor air distribution and radiant slab heating proved useful, and the 9,000-sf high-bay space is not air-conditionedāa bold move in Atlanta.
Features that helped the facility achieve net-zero design and LEED Platinum certification:Ā 1) PV arrays; 2) clerestory windows; 3) light louvers; 4) ceiling fan; 5) radiant slab heating; 6) a shared utility zone; 7) under-floor air distribution; 8) translucent Kalwall cladding; 9) operable windows; 10) permeable concrete; and 11) operable louvers.
Ā
āWe were willing to take some risks,ā says Wertheimer. āIf in the future the space becomes too uncomfortable, we have made provisions so we can add air conditioning. But in general, we were willing to take some internal risks to explore new ideas.ā
The buildingās initial energy baseline was modeled at 147 kBtu/sf/year: drastically less than the 200 to 400 kBtu typical for research labs. Passive design and selected energy-efficiency strategies ultimately reduced that number to 70 kBtu/sf/year. Crucial to making the numbers work: crystalline PV panels installed on the roof, a south-facing wall, and a parking canopy, with an anticipated electrical output of 388,000 kWh/year. This contribution represents 56% of the buildingās expected electrical demand, and 26% of the overall baseline energy demand.
Team strategies that helped produce a successful project included:
ā¢ BIM. The clientās highest ever Level of Development with BIM, LOD 500, was selected. The model was used not only to guide design but also for project management, clash detection, and shop drawing review and preconstruction meetings. Georgia Tech took advantage of the Building Teamās expertise to develop a campuswide BIM execution plan during the project.
ā¢ Interactive scheduling. Gilbane and its subcontractors met weekly in a field office for updates, benefitting from implementation of a 4-D Navisworks scheduling platform and regular use of a three-week ālook aheadā schedule and milestones.
ā¢ Energy modeling. Various mechanical system options were rigorously analyzed for life cycle cost ramifications. For instance, the Building Team compared a high-efficiency, magnetic-bearing chiller with a ground-source heat exchange system. They rejected the ground-source system, which cost $500,000 more, after modeling revealed that it was slightly less energy-efficient. The cost-benefit profiles of forced natural ventilation, an enthalpy wheel, a night setback for HVAC, and daylighting controls all were verified before systems were approved; insulated translucent exterior panels didnāt make the cut.
ā¢ Lean principles. Gilbaneās chief estimator came on board early and used real-time cost models as the design progressed, giving HDR continuous feedback. This procedure reduced the need for drastic value engineering during later stages. Says Gilbaneās Stewart, āWe were at the HDR office three or four times a week, seeing where the design was going and keeping the pricing on track. That made the ultimate buyout a lot easier. We avoided a slowdown in VE, which is something that can kill a project.ā
Ā
In the mid-bay labs, transparent garage-type doors allow experiments to be moved in and out. Overhead utility infrastructure keeps floor space and lab benches unencumbered.
Ā
A year after occupancy, the facility is tracking extremely well on its energy-use estimates, says Wertheimer. āPart of that is because we still donāt have really heavy plug loads,ā he explains. āWeāre not yet fully occupied, so the equipment picture is not complete, but we expect the increase in energy use will be significant. In any event, weāll be in a much better place than we would have been if weād created a more conventional building.ā
The project has garnered numerous state and national awards, including High Honors in R&D Magazineās 2013 Laboratory of the Year competition. Team members have made many presentations at professional conferences, helping to ensure that the lessons learned will resonate beyond Atlanta.
Rew concludes, āThere are a lot of ideas here that Tech has explored in other places around the campus and pulled together in this project. Not just in energy efficiency, but also in material selection, site use, water retentionājust doing the right thing across the board. Itās a LEED Platinum project, but I donāt think Tech was just shooting for a LEED goal. Doing a building like this is a lot more fun than just chasing LEED points.ā
Careful planning makes the most of passive ventilation and reduces energy demand. Sustainable strategies are documented and tracked through a ādashboardā display in the lobby, which helps students understand various metrics (energy use, PV generation, ambient air temperature, lighting levels, water consumption).
Ā
Project summary
PLATINUM AWARD
Georgia Tech Carbon-Neutral Energy Solutions (CNES) Laboratory
Atlanta
BUILDING TEAM
Submitting firms: Gilbane Building Co. and HDR Inc. (design-build team)
Owner: Georgia Tech
Structural: Ksi/Structural Engineers
MEP/civil: HDR
Energy modeling: EMO Energy Solutions
GENERAL INFORMATION
Project size: 42,000 sf
Construction cost: $22.4 million
Construction time: May 2011 to July 2012
Delivery method: Design-build
Related Stories
| Apr 25, 2012
Missner Group names McCrory VP of property management
McCrory will be responsible for overseeing the financial and operational needs of the firmās commercial real estate portfolio which includes more than two million square feet of property.
| Apr 25, 2012
Rogers joins Morgan/Harbour as senior project manager
Rogers will also manage the construction process and daily activities as well as act as the interface between the subcontractors, owners, municipalities and regulatory agencies
| Apr 25, 2012
J.C. Anderson selected for 50,000-sf build out at Chicagoās DePaul University
The build-out will consist of the construction of new offices, meeting rooms, video rooms and a state-of-the-art multi-tiered Trading Room.
| Apr 24, 2012
ULI Real Estate Consensus Forecast, projects improvements for the real estate industry through 2014
Survey is based on opinions from 38 of the nationās leading real estate economists and analysts and suggests a marked increase in commercial real estate activity, with total transaction volume expected to rise from $250 billion in 2012 to $312 billion in 2014.
| Apr 24, 2012
Roofing Supply Group acquired by Clayton, Dubilier & Rice
RSG provides a complete offering of residential and commercial roofing materials and related supplies.
| Apr 24, 2012
McLennan named Ashoka Fellow
McLennan was recognized for his work on the Living Building Challenge.
| Apr 24, 2012
AECOM design and engineering team realizes NASA vision for Sustainability Base
LEED Platinum facility opens at NASA Ames Research Center at Californiaās Moffett Field.
| Apr 23, 2012
Vegasā CityCenter called financial āblack holeā
Two and a half years ago, stockholders filed six lawsuits after the stock price fell from $99.75 on Oct. 9, 2007, to $1.89 on March 5, 2009. Bondholders sued over similar steep losses.
| Apr 23, 2012
Innovative engineering behind BIGās Vancouver Tower
Buro Happoldās structural design supports the top-heavy, complex building in a high seismic zone; engineers are using BIM technology to design a concrete structure with post-tensioned walls.