flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Electronic plan review: Coming soon to a city near you?

Electronic plan review: Coming soon to a city near you?


Sasha Reed | November 25, 2013

With all the effort architects, general contractors, engineers, consultants, and specialty contractors put into leveraging technology to communicate digitally on projects, it is a shame that there is often one major road block that becomes the paper in their otherwise “paperless” project: the local city planning and permitting department. 

With strict protocols and slow approval processes, many local cities and municipalities are struggling to make the migration to the digital age. And progressive project teams across the country are feeling the whiplash from having to put on the brakes and revert back to paper during this process.  

One large civil engineering firm recently told me that for all of the progress they’ve made to facilitate a paperless project, the progress stops at the city interaction. And until we get our cities and municipalities on board with electronic submittal, review and permitting processes, we will continue to see halted progress.  

Over the past four years, I’ve seen the struggle cities face up close and personal. From depleted budgets to lack of IT infrastructure to outdated laws, these are the challenges which hold them back from making any real progress. 

However, there are some municipalities which have made this migration a priority. They may be in the minority, but they are growing. From Washington to North Carolina to cities as small as Plano, Texas, to as large as Los Angeles County, many of them now offer e-permitting and submission of PDF plans for review.  

With collaboration technology bridging the gap between project team members, some are navigating away from traditionally paper-based reviews to online, collaborative review sessions. The cost savings being realized is not only from increases in productivity as a result of faster review cycles, but also from eliminating unexpected setbacks. For example, one city cited having as many as one workman’s comp claim per project due to the weight of the drawings sets being handled by reviewers! That has been drastically reduced simply by allowing clients to submit PDF drawing sets for review.  

Given that all projects must go through a permitting process, I wonder how this affects you and your projects. How do you work with your city? Are you able to submit digital plans for review? If not, do you wish you could?

Editor's Note: This is sponsored content. All text and images were supplied by the sponsor company.  

More from Author

Sasha Reed | Dec 15, 2017

Future vs. current state of construction innovation: How will we make the leap?

Looking beyond today’s constraints to the possibility of what “could be” is a key characteristic of those defining and delivering innovation to design and building firms across the globe.

Sasha Reed | Sep 19, 2017

BIM vs VDC…how the US and the UK differ in approaching digital project delivery

In this four-part series, Bluebeam VP Sasha Reed sat down with industry experts to examine the need for defining and understanding digital workflows and data management throughout the design and construction project lifecycle.

Sasha Reed | Jul 19, 2017

Introducing StrXur by Bluebeam

Our goal is to present unique perspectives you may not be able to find anywhere else.  

Sasha Reed | Jul 13, 2017

Defining the future by mastering the art of change

From my perspective, what separates organizations thriving in the digital revolution from those who are not boils down to one thing: leadership.

Sasha Reed | Mar 15, 2017

Incentivizing change: Show me the money

Who is succeeding, and on what terms? And what will it take for everyone to experience the benefits of that success?

Sasha Reed | Oct 4, 2016

The talent shortage: Will the training the AEC industry desperately needs arrive in time?

As the construction industry bounces back from the Great Recession, an entirely new class of tech-savvy construction professionals has been created, and the supply of these highly skilled, tech-proficient pros has been quickly exhausted. 

Sasha Reed | Jul 11, 2016

Construction Disruption at AECX: Technology, hackathons and the promise of change in LA

The lead up to AECX featured a discussion providing insight into the current state of the AEC technological revolution by exploring opportunities, challenges and choices AEC pros face.  

Sasha Reed | Jun 23, 2016

Implementing Change: The Five Biggest Mistakes to Avoid

Two truths from the jobsite: 1) The best part about uncovering a problem is discovering its solution, and 2) The worst part about discovering the solution is implementing it. 

Sasha Reed | Jun 9, 2016

With all these sharks in the water… (No Predictions Here...Part 2)

Rather than fighting to control the proliferation of apps, perhaps we should be training our eyes to look for signs of long-term viability among all the fins in the water

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021