flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Better guidance for appraising green buildings is steadily emerging

Better guidance for appraising green buildings is steadily emerging

The Appraisal Foundation is striving to improve appraisers’ understanding of green valuation.


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | October 29, 2014
One Bryant Park, New York. Photo: Ryan Browne, Cook+Fox Architects via Wikipedia
One Bryant Park, New York. Photo: Ryan Browne, Cook+Fox Architects via Wikipedia

Builders, developers, and owners are constantly complaining that high-performance buildings rarely get their due from appraisers who, they say, don’t have good measures to compare one building’s energy savings over another’s, or how those savings affect the value of the building. 

The Appraisal Foundation, a nonprofit organization authorized by Congress to establish appraisal standards, is working methodically to alter this perceived image of cluelessness. Within the next few weeks, the Foundation is expected to issue the final draft of its guidance related to background and competency for appraisers valuing green buildings.

John Brenan, the Foundation’s director of appraisal issues, tells BD+C that states may elect to start adopting this guidance by early next year. And while the guidance would be voluntary, Brenan believes it may serve as a safe harbor for appraisers performing appraisals on green buildings.

The final guidance relating to the valuation of green buildings may offer methods and techniques to allow compliance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP).

That Board—which utilizes panels of experts, including those with green-building expertise—is one of three independent boards that comprise the Foundation, the other two being the Appraiser Qualifications Board and the Appraisal Standards Board.

The Foundation is also working on more specific guidance for appraisers to use when valuing the “greenness” of one- to four-unit residential buildings; and commercial, multifamily, and institutional properties. 

Brenan says these guidances would contain methods and techniques that show appraisers what to look for and how to compare a building’s green features, materials, and construction management with other buildings in a market.

He expects an initial “exposure draft” of these guidances could be available for public comment in the first quarter of 2015. “Our hope is that all three advisories are adopted by late 2015, so the Foundation would have a tool kit for appraisers and regulators to use.”

At press time, Brenan was unable to elaborate on the proposed methodologies. And he is quick to note that appraisers don’t set values; “they just mirror what’s going on in a market.”

He did note, however, that the guidance being developed includes how to compare properties that have sold with like green features, and how to recognize market-to-market differences. 

“One of the most interesting potential [guidances] would be to look at anticipated cost savings over an extended period of time,” he says. 

Brenan points out that there is never going to be a “plug-in formula” for green valuation that fits all buildings. “It is still completely market-driven, and markets are stratified. Just because you have green features doesn’t mean the appraisal will be apples to apples. It’s kind of a sliding scale.” 

That being said, Brenan readily acknowledges that there aren’t enough appraisers out there who are competent enough to assess how high performance should be factored into a home’s valuation. He’s speaking from experience. “I live in California, in a home that has a solar photovoltaic system, and the appraiser didn’t know what to do with it.  So that became a little educational experience.” 

Brenan says that anyone in the building, design, and construction sectors who wants to get involving in helping to develop these guidances can contact him directly at John@appraisalfoundation.org.

Related Stories

| Feb 17, 2012

MacInnis joins Gilbane board of directors

MacInnis is the chairman and recently retired CEO of Connecticut-based EMCOR Group, Inc.

| Feb 16, 2012

Gain greater agility and profitability with ArchiCAD BIM software

White paper was written with the sole purpose of providing accurate, reliable information about critical issues related to BIM and what ArchiCAD with advanced technology such as the GRAPHISOFT BIM Server provide as an answer to address these issues.

| Feb 16, 2012

TLC Engineering for Architecture opens Chattanooga office

TLC Engineering for Architecture provides mechanical, electrical, structural, plumbing, fire protection, communication, technology, LEED, commissioning and energy auditing services.

| Feb 16, 2012

Summit Design + Build begins build-out for Emmi Solutions in Chicago

The new headquarters will total 20,455 sq. ft. and feature a loft-style space with exposed masonry and mechanical systems, 15 foot clear ceilings, two large rooftop skylights and private offices with full glass partition walls.

| Feb 16, 2012

Highland named president of McCarthy Building Companies’ California region

Highland moved into this new role in January 2012 following a six-month transition period with Carter Chappell, the company’s former president, California region.

| Feb 16, 2012

Big-box retailers not just for DIYers

Nearly half of all contractor purchases made from stores like Home Depot and Lowe's.

| Feb 16, 2012

4.8-megawatt solar power system completed at Jersey Gardens Mall

Solar array among the largest rooftop systems in North America.

| Feb 15, 2012

Fourth-generation Ryan to lead Ryan Companies AE team

Ryan leads a team of eight architects, four civil engineers, two landscape architects and two virtual building specialists in their efforts to realize their customer’s vision and needs through Ryan’s integrated project delivery system.

| Feb 15, 2012

NAHB sees gradual improvement in multifamily sales for boomers

However, since the conditions of the current overall housing market are limiting their ability to sell their existing homes, this market is not recovering as quickly as might have been expected.

| Feb 15, 2012

Skanska secures $87M contract for subway project

The construction value of the project is $261.9 M. Skanska will include its full share, $87 M, in the bookings for Skanska USA Civil for the first quarter 2012.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021