Building information modeling is changing the way buildings are designed and constructed. Once regarded as the future of the industry, BIM is now being used by most Building Teams on a daily basis.In a recent survey conducted by Building Design+Construction, more than 75% of respondents indicated they currently use BIM or plan to use it. Respondents were also asked to comment on their experiences with BIM, what they liked and disliked about BIM, and what BIM-related advice they would give to their peers.
How long have you
(or your firm) used BIM?
- More than 5 years: 26%
- Never, and do not plan to use: 23%
- Less than 3 years: 18%
- 3-4 years: 17%
- Never, but plan to use: 16%
N = 115 | Note: Respondents could only make one selection.
Typical responses included: “BIM is a powerful tool for use by architects, engineers, and designers.” “BIM is a great step forward for the architectural design professional thanks to overall coordination of the design documents.” “BIM has paid for itself by saving construction labor man-hours.”
“I find BIM reduces time to create accurate construction documents and quickly produce schematic design visualization for my clients,” commented another respondent. “We’re migrating beyond adoption to companywide integration and pushing beyond that to the full supply chain spectrum to owners, trade contractors, manufacturers, architects, and designers,” added another.
Respondents also commented on their preference for a specific BIM program. “As a long-time user of BIM, we almost exclusively use Revit in all our projects.” “Revit is the only way to go. We’ve been 100% Revit for 10 years.”
Respondent opinion on BIM varied based on their user experience.
“BIM is a great tool that forces early design decisions. However, in the end it is only a tool, the project should not be held hostage by BIM.”
Another mentioned, “We’re almost moving to try to stop talking about BIM. For the first few years we were ‘pushing’; now the ‘pull’ is finally happening. It’s a shift to applied uses and values instead of discussions about technology—solving the problems of internal and external customers. It’s kind of a surprising turn of events—a shift of focus.”
Which of the following BIM programs have you (or your firm) used in the past 18-24 months?
- Autodesk Revit: 84%
- Graphisoft ArchiCAD: 6%
- Nemetschek Vectorworks: 6%
- Bentley Microstation: 4%
N = 71 | Note: Respondents could only make one selection.
BIM does have some detractors, as evidence by these comments: “The software is clearly not user-friendly—using BIM is a financial disaster for us.” “It is impossible to produce prelims that have a complete look. Information generated isn’t particularly useful and it’s not used at all in the field,” wrote another. “Until a critical mass of professionals on all levels are fully versed with BIM, it will be a very awkward process.” Others wrote, “The initial cost is out of the reach for most small practitioners. Worse than expense is the training required.”“Once in a while we have projects that are better served by AutoCAD due to availability of existing information or layouts from suppliers. However, those projects are becoming fewer. The benefits to our MEP engineers in coordination and scheduling are huge,” wrote another respondent.
Some of the specific problems related to BIM involve other members of the Building Team. “BIM does not work because subcontractors will not cooperate.” “Very few contractors are using BIM,” wrote another. “Engineers are having problems converting to BIM although we require them to use it on most projects.” “Designers need to know the project-scope point at which BIM becomes useful, and not before.” “BIM will cost the A/E community due to the extra time and expense without additional compensation. The information comes too late to coordinate and adjust drawings. Repeated computer crashes, or lock-ups, make it a miserable working environment.”
When do you use BIM?
- During schematic design, procurement, and operation: 34%
- During development of a
construction project: 32%- During pre-design: 28%
- During construction: 23%
- During post-design, pre-consultation: 18%
- All of the above: 32%
- None of the above: 31%
N = 102 | Note: Respondents could make multiple selections.
BIM USERS PROVIDE ADVICE TO INDUSTRY PEERS
A number of respondents offered some advice to other BIM users in the industry. “The true revolution in BIM will be when designers just have to hand off a model and data files to constructors and not fret over publishing 2D plans, sections, schedules, etc., from BIM.” A respondent suggested, “Design professionals need to share BIM models with owners and contractors to show them what can be done, and how it can be used. Share the model to improve the project and delivery.”
“Leverage scheduling early in the process to establish space types, pre-populate them with the appropriate objects, and model as little as possible,” commented another respondent.
Survey respondents also provided a brief glimpse into BIM’s place in the AEC industry of tomorrow. “BIM is the future and those architects that fail to get on board should consider early retirement. There needs to be more (and better) models available from suppliers.” Said another, “Any professional not using BIM will ultimately be left behind by the industry.”
MAJOR FINDINGS OF THE BIM STUDY
1. Autodesk Revit was the top choice for BIM programs, with 84% of respondents using it in the past 18-24 months.
2. BIM was used most often during schematic design, procurement, and operation (34%) and during development of a construction project (32%).
How often do building owners require BIM on one or more projects?
- Less than 25 percent: 76%
- 25-50 percent: 17%
- 50-75 percent: 4%
- Greater than 75 percent: 3%
N = 101 | Respondents could only make one selection.
3. Full support of construction documents (54%); and multidisciplinary capability serving different segments of the AEC industry (43%) were deemed the two most important general factors by respondents.
4. Construction partners that do not use BIM (50%) and clients that do not use BIM (42%) are the biggest problems faced by respondents. Training takes up too much time (37%) and the object library is not large enough/objects must be created (36%) are other problems.
5. In regard to owners that require BIM be used on their projects, 65% of respondents indicated the owners just specify that BIM be used on the project. Requiring a 3D model and clash detection using model navigation software (31%) was second most popular response.
6. Architects (47%) take most advantage of BIM-related technology followed by contractors (33%), MEP engineers (13%), and structural engineers (7%). BD+C
Related Stories
| Nov 2, 2010
Energy Analysis No Longer a Luxury
Back in the halcyon days of 2006, energy analysis of building design and performance was a luxury. Sure, many forward-thinking AEC firms ran their designs through services such as Autodesk’s Green Building Studio and IES’s Virtual Environment, and some facility managers used Honeywell’s Energy Manager and other monitoring software. Today, however, knowing exactly how much energy your building will produce and use is survival of the fittest as energy costs and green design requirements demand precision.
| Nov 2, 2010
Yudelson: ‘If It Doesn’t Perform, It Can’t Be Green’
Jerry Yudelson, prolific author and veteran green building expert, challenges Building Teams to think big when it comes to controlling energy use and reducing carbon emissions in buildings.
| Nov 2, 2010
Historic changes to commercial building energy codes drive energy efficiency, emissions reductions
Revisions to the commercial section of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) represent the largest single-step efficiency increase in the history of the national, model energy. The changes mean that new and renovated buildings constructed in jurisdictions that follow the 2012 IECC will use 30% less energy than those built to current standards.
| Nov 1, 2010
Sustainable, mixed-income housing to revitalize community
The $41 million Arlington Grove mixed-use development in St. Louis is viewed as a major step in revitalizing the community. Developed by McCormack Baron Salazar with KAI Design & Build (architect, MEP, GC), the project will add 112 new and renovated mixed-income rental units (market rate, low-income, and public housing) totaling 162,000 sf, plus 5,000 sf of commercial/retail space.
| Nov 1, 2010
John Pearce: First thing I tell designers: Do your homework!
John Pearce, FAIA, University Architect at Duke University, Durham, N.C., tells BD+C’s Robert Cassidy about the school’s construction plans and sustainability efforts, how to land work at Duke, and why he’s proceeding with caution when it comes to BIM.
| Nov 1, 2010
Vancouver’s former Olympic Village shoots for Gold
The first tenants of the Millennium Water development in Vancouver, B.C., were Olympic athletes competing in the 2010 Winter Games. Now the former Olympic Village, located on a 17-acre brownfield site, is being transformed into a residential neighborhood targeting LEED ND Gold. The buildings are expected to consume 30-70% less energy than comparable structures.
| Oct 27, 2010
Grid-neutral education complex to serve students, community
MVE Institutional designed the Downtown Educational Complex in Oakland, Calif., to serve as an educational facility, community center, and grid-neutral green building. The 123,000-sf complex, now under construction on a 5.5-acre site in the city’s Lake Merritt neighborhood, will be built in two phases, the first expected to be completed in spring 2012 and the second in fall 2014.
| Oct 21, 2010
GSA confirms new LEED Gold requirement
The General Services Administration has increased its sustainability requirements and now mandates LEED Gold for its projects.
| Oct 18, 2010
World’s first zero-carbon city on track in Abu Dhabi
Masdar City, the world’s only zero-carbon city, is on track to be built in Abu Dhabi, with completion expected as early as 2020. Foster + Partners developed the $22 billion city’s master plan, with Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture, Aedas, and Lava Architects designing buildings for the project’s first phase, which is on track to be ready for occupancy by 2015.
