flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

BD&C Reconstruction Awards Judging Criteria

BD&C Reconstruction Awards Judging Criteria


August 11, 2010

Design, Engineering & Construction Criteria

  • Unusual owner/client requirements

  • Inventive use of materials, successful use of unusual or new materials

  • Structural engineering issues and solutions

  • M/E/P innovations, fresh approaches

  • Energy/environment breakthroughs

  • Sustainable design, green building design, LEED

  • Craftsmanship, detailing, elegance of execution

  • Use of innovative technology, methods, tools

  • Use of value engineering to produce better results for the project

  • Cost/budget issues – and evidence of resolution

  • Evidence of performance-based design

  • Overall design & construction quality

  • Security issues, unusual approaches, results

  • Social or cultural relevance of project

  • Other measures of success (creating jobs, neighborhood renewal, etc.)

  • Wayfinding

  • Innovative construction methods, approaches

  • Construction safety

  • Construction & demolition waste recycling efforts

  • Unusual scheduling issues,timing demands

  • Commissioning results

  • Post-occupancy evaluation, metrics of satisfaction

  • Any patents, inventions or technology innovations resulting from project?

  • Project complexity – Was the project unusually challenging? In what way?

SUMMARY: Did this project push the envelope? How? By what measure? Proof?

Social, Planning, Economic & Community Criteria

  • Evidence of extraordinary efforts to meet owner needs

  • Involvement of surrounding community, neighbors, affected stakeholders

  • Involvement of public officials, public agencies

  • Charettes, planning sessions with community, end users, other relevant stakeholders

  • Attention to surrounding environment, historic areas, community sensitivities

  • Attention to environmental issues: wetlands, open space, recreation areas, etc.

  • Extensive surveying, polling, or other techniques to gauge public opinion or gather ideas

  • Unusual “gaming” or innovative tools to assess client or end-user needs

  • Evidence of involvement of ‘less-empowered end-users’ (students in school project, nurses in hospital, minorities, immigrants, etc.)

  • Overcoming unanticipated changes in the program

  • Overcoming natural disaster (flood, hurricane), man-made disaster (loss of power supply), materials shortages

  • Unusual solutions to budget restrictions

  • Unusual solutions to keep project schedule on time

  • Extra effort in hiring women-owned, minority-owned, or disadvantaged-owned firms

  • Special social or cultural relevance of project

  • Additional measures of community-related success (jobs, neighborhood renewal, etc.)

  • Evidence of performance-based design, engineering, and/or construction

SUMMARY: Did the project perform a public good or create a public benefit?

Also see BD&C's How to to Win Tip Sheet.

Click here to register.

boombox1
boombox2
native1
halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021