There is growing curiosity about how artificial intelligence and machine learning fit into architecture, engineering, and construction. A new survey of A/E firms found that more than three-fifths of 652 respondents expect AI to improve their operational efficiency.
That survey, though, also found that the same portion of respondents wasn’t using AI yet, and two-thirds admitted they were struggling with where and how to apply AI.
These findings are part of the 45th annual Clarity Architecture & Engineering Study, a comprehensive report conducted by the enterprise software provider Deltek, and sponsored by AIA, the American Council of Engineering Companies, the Association of Consulting Engineering Companies|Canada, and the Society of Marketing Professional Services. The survey was taken between January and March of this year.
The report is organized to explore trends in Technology, Business Development, Human Capital Management, and Financial Management.
It found key financial metrics had held steady in 2023, reflecting an equilibrium following general economic volatility, inflationary pressures, and talent shortages observed in recent years. The survey’s respondents were generating, on average, 18.7% operating profit on net revenue that they forecast would grow that year by 10.9%.
The volume of proposal submissions and contracts awarded increased in 2023, yet the overall value of those contracts receded compared to the previous year. Work on existing buildings continued to be a strong opportunity area, notably in reconstruction, renovation and interiors versus new builds. Indeed, business has been so robust that firms have had the luxury of being more selective about the projects they accept.
But challenges remain: while high talent turnover has waned, worker shortages persist and many firms continue to make do with less, requiring the best-performing A/E firms to seek operational efficiencies and to cross-train talent.
Expanding tech use continues to be a strategic priority
The report observes that, more than ever, A/E leaders are making technology a primary strategic focus. In doing so, Deltek urges those firms to turn to their own staffs for guidance, tap outside expertise, and consider client needs above all. Once A/E firms establish strategic priorities for technology, perceived cost will transition to an investment with long-term payoffs. Until then, “firms that allow costs to prevent them from advancing their business will fall behind. Firms must see past individual competing interests and expenses,” the report states.
When it comes to technological sophistication, A/E firms hold a relatively high opinion of themselves, with 35% self-classifying as “advanced” and “mature” on a digital transformation spectrum. Another 43% identify their firms as in the “applied” stage, which is in the center of the spectrum.
(The irony of these responses is that A/E firms are still reliant on manual data entry, especially for operations, administrative, and accounting. It’s not surprising, then, that 64% of respondents prioritized the creation of strategic technology implementation plans and 56% indicated the need to educate staff on critical technology trends.)
Looking ahead, 76% of firms are more than twice as likely to envision themselves as “advanced” and “mature” in just a few years. Another 18% expect to reach the “applied” stage, leaving only six percentage points in the immature “exploratory” and “nascent” stages.
Despite their relatively modest usage rate so far, firms largely expect AI to help most with improving operational efficiency (62%), improving project timeline/delivery (52%) and reducing overhead costs (35%). These priorities spotlight the urgent need to refine internal processes to yield cost savings and operational improvements.
On the other hand, concerns about data and cybersecurity have not abated for A/E firms, as more than 60% of respondents ranked it in their top three challenges for their IT operations two years in a row, with 29% identifying it as their No. 1 challenge.
Almost half of firms report they leverage cloud solutions for more than 60% of their firm’s infrastructure, systems, workstations and storage. Significantly, even firms with historically few cloud solutions (0% to 19% leverage) have started their digital transformation journeys, jumping from 18% to 23% in one year.
Nearly one in four firms—16%—now offers technology services to clients as a revenue generator, or has one under consideration (7%). These services include technology consulting, application development, smart buildings/smart infrastructure and digital twins, among other services.
Career development programs being added
The report’s other revealing findings include:
•Firms with formal business development processes increased slightly to 46%. The report states that diversification is “strategically important,” as is finding the right teaming partners to identify and pursue opportunities outside of traditional offerings;
•Competing priorities (60%) and staff shortages (54%) ranked as the top two project management challenges, indicating that project managers currently feel like they’re getting stretched too thin and without sufficient support. Firms reported that 58% of projects were on or ahead of schedule, the lowest rate in seven years (it was 75% in 2017). Consequently, more firms are investing in project management training;
•Given the ongoing shortages in skilled labor—turnover still hovers around 14%—a growing number of firms are introducing and adopting structured career development programs. Overall, firms with career development plans grew to just under 40%, a 13-percentage-point increase year over year. Medium-sized and large firms demonstrated the most substantial growth in this area with medium-sized firms growing from 37% to 48%, and large firms climbing from 32% to 56%.
More firms are also turning toward providing better benefits to attract talent. More than a quarter of firms now utilize competitive benefits, up four percentage points year over year.
Related Stories
| Jun 13, 2017
Accelerate Live! talk: Scaling change in a changing industry, Chris Mayer, Suffolk Construction
Suffolk’s CIO Chris Mayer talks about the firm’s framework for vetting and implementing new technologies and processes.
| Jun 13, 2017
Accelerate Live! talk: Gaming tech in construction, Lucas Richmond, Gilbane
Learn why Gilbane’s Lucas Richmond is looking outside the AEC industry to build his rockstar gaming and media team.
| Jun 12, 2017
Accelerate Live! talk: The world's smartest buildings, Derik Eckhardt, Miller Hull Partnership
Discover what architect Derik Eckhardt learned during his worldwide tour of the globe’s smartest buildings, from Abu Dhabi to Amsterdam to Stuttgart to Dubai.
| Jun 12, 2017
Accelerate Live! talk: Preparing for the AI revolution, Alan Robles, Gensler
Gensler’s Alan Robles shares how the AEC Giant firm is preparing its project teams and clients for the coming artificial intelligence movement.
| May 24, 2017
Accelerate Live! talk: Applying machine learning to building design, Daniel Davis, WeWork
Daniel Davis offers a glimpse into the world at WeWork, and how his team is rethinking workplace design with the help of machine learning tools.
| May 24, 2017
Accelerate Live! talk: Learning from Silicon Valley - Using SaaS to automate AEC, Sean Parham, Aditazz
Sean Parham shares how Aditazz is shaking up the traditional design and construction approaches by applying lessons from the tech world.
| May 24, 2017
Accelerate Live! talk: The data-driven future for AEC, Nathan Miller, Proving Ground
In this 15-minute talk at BD+C’s Accelerate Live! (May 11, 2017, Chicago), Nathan Miller presents his vision of a data-driven future for the business of design.
AEC Tech | May 23, 2017
A funny thing may happen on the way to AI
As AI proves safe, big business will want to reduce overhead.
AEC Tech | May 11, 2017
Accelerate Live!: Social media reactions from BD+C's AEC innovation conference
BD+C's inaugural Accelerate Live! innovation conference took place May 11, in Chicago.
AEC Tech | Feb 16, 2017
Positioning computational designers in your business: 4 things to consider
There appears to be very little industry consensus as to what a ‘computational design’ position actually means in a business setting.