flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Apple spars with Cupertino, Calif., mayor over strained city infrastructure

Codes and Standards

Apple spars with Cupertino, Calif., mayor over strained city infrastructure

Apple’s new ‘spaceship’ campus project prompts questions about whether the company should pay more to offset traffic woes.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | May 10, 2016

Apple's new campus. Rendering courtesy City of Cupertino

The construction of Apple’s new $5 billion campus in Cupertino, Calif., has raised tensions over whether the company and other large employers should pay more in taxes to local communities to help offset their impact on local infrastructure.

Many people in Cupertino have begun to organize and focus on Silicon Valley’s aging transportation networks. Frustrated by traffic and noise, some residents want to stop further development. Traffic woes have been occasionally worsened by temporary road closures related to Apple’s new headquarters construction.

Apple paid $9.2 million in taxes to Cupertino from 2012 to 2013, according to a report in the Guardian. In the 2012 fiscal year, Apple tallied $156.5 billion in sales. The city gives Apple an annual tax break on business-to-business sales that started in 1997, when Apple was on the verge of collapse, the Guardian reported.

Cupertino Mayor Barry Chang, who has butted heads with Apple over the issue, says the high-tech giant should pay more taxes to the city, but doesn’t want to see limits on new development for fear that they could harm the regional economy.

Related Stories

| May 8, 2014

Door knob code revisions generating controversy

The City of Vancouver’s ban on doorknobs in all new buildings, which went into effect last month, has drawn a strong reaction from the public and heated debate across Canada as other jurisdictions consider the measure.

| May 8, 2014

Structural concrete code revisions open for public comments

The American Concrete Institute’s completely reorganized ACI 318-14, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary,” is open for public review for a 45-day period.

| May 3, 2014

Controversy rages over cost, benefits of proposed OSHA silica dust rule

Introduced in August 2013, the proposal would lower allowable levels of crystalline silica in all workplaces, standardize how the dust is calculated, and require medical monitoring for employees exposed to high levels.

| May 3, 2014

California’s Title 24 promises to reshape the construction industry

California’s recent revisions to Title 24 contain ambitious performance goals: all residential buildings must be Zero Net Energy by 2020 and commercial buildings must reach that standard by 2030.

| Apr 30, 2014

House Appropriations Committee approves $3 billion cut for military construction

The Army would see the sharpest cuts on a percentage basis, with a $578 million, or 52% reduction in FY 2015.

| Apr 30, 2014

GSA wants to trade D.C. office building for construction and development services

The GSA has issued an RFQ seeking developers who can provide construction and development services in exchange for the GSA Regional Office Building and Cotton Annex located in Southwest Washington, D.C.

| Apr 30, 2014

Mexico City spending big on green roofs to fight air pollution

Although green roofs have been widely adopted in urban areas to reduce the heat island effect and stormwater runoff, Mexico City is hoping that vegetative rooftops can also reduce the city’s air pollution.

| Apr 23, 2014

California bill would make employers responsible for subcontractors' wages, workers' comp

Under the recently revised Assembly Bill 1897, employers would have to pay wages, taxes, and workers compensation on behalf of a subcontractor’s workers if the subcontractor reneges on that responsibility.

| Apr 23, 2014

Obama’s 2015 budget includes $1.7 billion to GSA for building construction, renovations

The Obama Administration has proposed $1.7 billion for construction, renovation, and repairs to federal buildings in fiscal year 2015 under the auspices of the U.S. General Services Administration.

| Apr 18, 2014

Massachusetts Supreme Court clarifies building code liability issue on mixed-use projects

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently ruled that distinct portions of a mixed-used building may be treated as distinct and different structures under the state building code.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Sustainability

Grimshaw launches free online tool to help accelerate decarbonization of buildings

Minoro, an online platform to help accelerate the decarbonization of buildings, was recently launched by architecture firm Grimshaw, in collaboration with more than 20 supporting organizations including World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), RIBA, Architecture 2030, the World Green Building Council (WorldGBC) and several national Green Building Councils from across the globe.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021