Fifty-two weeks. An entire year. That’s how long project teams are having to wait for certain building materials, systems, and equipment in the post-Covid environment. These include critical core-and-shell materials like steel, steel deck, steel joists, and roofing components such as ISO foam board insulation and fasteners. Even readily available “off-the-shelf” products like drywall, metal framing, and paint have lead times. Not to mention near-historic price inflation levels and shipping costs across almost every product category.
Faced with these immense supply chain issues—on top of the ongoing skilled labor shortage—building teams are forced to employ aggressive product procurement tactics to pull off new construction and major reconstruction programs on schedule—and anywhere close to budget. Common strategies include real-time price tracking, product availability analysis during the design and bidding phases, more-optimal project planning (duh!), and sourcing locally, when possible.
Some project teams are looking to eliminate much of the guesswork around product availability and price inflation by employing early bulk-purchasing measures for entire building projects, even multi-build developments. This “buy-and-store” approach to product procurement has worked for several recent healthcare projects led by design and construction giant Haskell, says Denise Muth, Project Director with the firm’s Infrastructure and Transportation group.
ALSO SEE: How building owners and developers can get ahead of the next supply chain disaster
“For one hospital project, it was determined to buy the whole project out from the start and utilize local storage leased by the hospital,” says Muth. “On another project, we accelerated roofing, MEP equipment, elevators, and steel to help jumpstart the lead time process while the balance of design is completed. Depending on the stage of design, our owners are encouraged to purchase the entire project as quickly as possible.”
AEC industry consultant Ryan Bosworth, Principal with Rider Levett Bucknall, urges project teams to take advantage of the glut in vacant or derelict retail stores, especially big boxes, to purchase building products in bulk and warehouse them locally. “Landlords are begging for revenue while they reposition properties,” he says, adding that these spaces are relatively inexpensive to rent and require little build-out.
This bulk-purchasing approach, while effective, does have its obstacles, says Muth, including added front-loaded costs for owners/developers, insurance considerations related to storage facilities, and the risk of changes to specifications or design after materials have been ordered and stored.
Related Stories
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Reconstruction Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. building reconstruction and renovation sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and STO Building Group head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest reconstruction sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 K-12 School Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. K-12 school facilities sector
AECOM, Gilbane, and PBK head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest K-12 school facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Sports Facilities Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. sports facilities sector
Kimley-Horn, Mortenson, and Populous top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest sports facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Office Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. office building sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and STO Building Group head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest office building sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Hotel Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. hospitality sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and Suffolk Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest hotel sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Healthcare Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. healthcare facilities sector
HDR, Jacobs, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest healthcare facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Government Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. government buildings sector
HNTB, Jacobs, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest government sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Cultural Facilities Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. cultural facilities sector
AECOM, Arup, and Populous head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest cultural facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 2, 2020
2020 Retail Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. retail building sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and PCL Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest retail sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 2, 2020
2020 University Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the higher education sector
Gensler, AECOM, and Turner Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest university sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
