flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

AISC seeks comments on draft earthquake standard for steel buildings

Codes and Standards

AISC seeks comments on draft earthquake standard for steel buildings

Includes new limits for cross-sectional slenderness of steel columns based on latest research.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 17, 2022
Steel tubes and beams

Courtesy Pixabay

The American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) recently issued a draft of AISC 341, a standard that provides guidance on designing earthquake-resistant steel buildings and it is available for public comments.

The draft standard incorporates new design limits for steel columns based on research conducted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the University of California San Diego. Using a shake table, researchers identified deficiencies in the performance of a certain type of column, with many test assemblies buckling prematurely.

Based on the findings, the researchers devised new limits for the cross-sectional slenderness of steel columns. “A lot of current design provisions are based on scaled-down column tests or a very small number of full-scale tests,” said NIST structural engineer John Harris in a news release. “But the full-scale testing we conducted has allowed us to begin filling in the knowledge gap regarding the performance of these kinds of columns under extreme loading conditions.”

The draft includes new slenderness limits on columns, with structural steel webs—sized according to the new limit—that could meet drift and stability requirements at the same time. The more stringent limits on steel column webs could soften the blow of earthquakes, potentially saving newly designed buildings from unnecessary damage or partial collapse.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jul 6, 2017

Flawed modeling to blame for green buildings failure to live up to hype on energy efficiency

Explains energy performance gap from expected savings to actual savings.

Codes and Standards | Jul 5, 2017

Research study examines tall timber buildings worldwide

Industry group developing criteria for categorizing wide range of construction approaches to tall timber buildings.

Codes and Standards | Jun 30, 2017

AAMA releases new document on aluminum fenestration and energy efficiency

The free download addresses entrances, storefront framing, curtain walls, windows and skylight fenestration systems.

Codes and Standards | Jun 29, 2017

Fire codes prevent cladding used on Grenfell Tower from being used in U.S.

Reports suggest an extra $6,300 for fire-resistant cladding could have prevented the tragedy.

Codes and Standards | Jun 28, 2017

Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, Standards ASCE/SEI 7-16, has been updated

The document is used for determining design loads including dead, live, soil, flood, tsunami, snow, rain, atmospheric ice, earthquake, wind, and fire.

Codes and Standards | Jun 27, 2017

Cold-formed steel framing engineering guide for building projects released

Better sound attenuation for subfloors and exterior continuous insulation are among the matters addressed.

Codes and Standards | Jun 26, 2017

L.A.’s new ordinance requires energy and water efficiency benchmarking

Structures 20,000 sf and larger must demonstrate steps to boost efficiency.

Codes and Standards | Jun 21, 2017

World Green Building Council: All buildings must be net zero by 2050 to avert 2°C rise

Building efficiency essential to tempering global climate change.

Codes and Standards | Jun 21, 2017

Senate bill would prohibit tax money for sports stadium projects

Bipartisan legislation would prevent use of municipal bonds by pro teams.

Codes and Standards | Jun 19, 2017

Developer, architect hit with $10 million construction defect verdict

Case pertained to construction of condo development that was not fire code-compliant.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category



Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.


halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021