flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

AISC seeks comments on draft earthquake standard for steel buildings

Codes and Standards

AISC seeks comments on draft earthquake standard for steel buildings

Includes new limits for cross-sectional slenderness of steel columns based on latest research.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 17, 2022
Steel tubes and beams

Courtesy Pixabay

The American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) recently issued a draft of AISC 341, a standard that provides guidance on designing earthquake-resistant steel buildings and it is available for public comments.

The draft standard incorporates new design limits for steel columns based on research conducted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the University of California San Diego. Using a shake table, researchers identified deficiencies in the performance of a certain type of column, with many test assemblies buckling prematurely.

Based on the findings, the researchers devised new limits for the cross-sectional slenderness of steel columns. “A lot of current design provisions are based on scaled-down column tests or a very small number of full-scale tests,” said NIST structural engineer John Harris in a news release. “But the full-scale testing we conducted has allowed us to begin filling in the knowledge gap regarding the performance of these kinds of columns under extreme loading conditions.”

The draft includes new slenderness limits on columns, with structural steel webs—sized according to the new limit—that could meet drift and stability requirements at the same time. The more stringent limits on steel column webs could soften the blow of earthquakes, potentially saving newly designed buildings from unnecessary damage or partial collapse.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Dec 13, 2017

New report examines ongoing costs of green infrastructure options

The report compares solutions to reduce stormwater.

Codes and Standards | Dec 12, 2017

Total cost of structural fires in U.S. reached $328.5 billion in 2014

Costs associated with losses was $55.4 billion.

Codes and Standards | Dec 11, 2017

Steel-timber composite system proposed for mid- and high-rise buildings

Structural steel columns and beams support a cross-laminated timber floor system.

Codes and Standards | Dec 7, 2017

Many coastal states performing poorly to protect beaches, coastlines

The most vulnerable regions fare the worst in new study.

Codes and Standards | Dec 5, 2017

Guide for understanding medical monitoring requirement of OSHA silica standard released

Center for Construction Research and Training gives advice on new regulation.

Codes and Standards | Dec 4, 2017

Trump tax proposal would kill historic tax credits

Developers would lose up to 20% discounts on some redevelopment projects.

Codes and Standards | Nov 30, 2017

Asheville, N.C. rezoning favors pedestrians, could change city’s character

Focus is on layout and look of new buildings rather than use.

Codes and Standards | Nov 29, 2017

Many New York City landlords have not addressed new flood codes

City revised building codes after Superstorm Sandy, but many owners not required to upgrade.

Codes and Standards | Nov 28, 2017

Nail-Laminated timber Canadian design and construction guide released

Includes practical strategies and guidance with lessons from real-life projects.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.



halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021