Sports and recreation architects have always worked in close consultation with their clients, seeking answers to hundreds of questions about everything from the program’s biggest needs to the building’s smallest details. To that end, architects host charrettes, employ surveys, hold open forums and perform informal interviews with program administrators, maintenance staff, students and anyone else with a stake in the completed project.
All of these are helpful — some are vital — but, unfortunately, each are limited in scope. For example, a survey can help gauge student interest in particular activities or in raising their fees to pay for a facility, but a traditional survey can’t reach enough respondents or be of sufficient detail to give a full picture of the current (or desired) user experience.
Crowdsourcing, a term coined in 2006, is increasingly being employed to fill this gap using a variety of online tools and services, but to be effective, it requires the right survey instrument and a knowledgeable team of professionals to employ it — to create an effective survey, compile and analyze the data and, ideally, to integrate with other professionals and stakeholders to ensure that the knowledge gained by the exercise doesn’t fall between the cracks.
As one firm that has embraced crowdsourcing as part of our broader data-driven efforts, we’re beginning to see applications for this type of approach far beyond what we envisioned when we first developed Sasaki Strategies, a group formalized in 2005 with the goal of creating a strong analytical function to support the firm’s planning and design work. On the heels of many successful deployments in city and campus planning, we’re now bringing crowdsourcing to bear on post-occupancy research, allowing our architects to better understand what aspects of their buildings are operating as they anticipated, and what areas can be improved in future designs. What we’re discovering is that there is no detail too small to be analyzed.
As an example, consider a very typical treatment in contemporary fitness centers. Daylight streams into the space through curtainwall and past a perimeter of fitness equipment, facing out. Designing and outfitting the space in this way simultaneously gives exercisers a dramatic view and animates the building from the outside, and also adheres to CPTED (crime prevention through environmental design) principles, ensuring that exterior pathways and parking lots are “policed” by fitness center users.
This is what an architect would tell you. Do you know what exercisers would tell you? If a large number of users told you that they don’t like exercising in full display of passersby, would that change the way you operated your facility? If you were an architect, would it change your approach to these facilities in the future?
Ask, And You Shall Receive
Sasaki’s internal think tank of programmers and analysts got its official “Strategies” designation about 10 years ago. The group has doubled in size in just the past three years to around nine full-time members, in concert with the development and rollout of its biggest technological breakthrough to date, an online interactive mapping program.
Bearing a flexible name (myCampus in campus planning, myCommunity in municipal and regional planning), each iteration of the program allows survey respondents to drag and drop multiple icons onto a graphic representation of a campus or streetscape and comment at any length about a particular location. Icons sporting different colors and graphics denote different topic areas, so that a viewer can see at a glance where the trouble spots (or favorite spaces) are. Typical icons in a campus planning mode might allow respondents to show areas of the campus where they do or do not feel safe, the routes on which they typically walk or the location of their preferred parking lots.
In one recent use of the tool, respondents at Harvard Kennedy School graphically illustrated for administrators how the campus’ “front door” was underutilized, helping the firm’s planners make the case for a future shift in campus orientation. myCampus is now associated with huge usage numbers on a number of campuses — as of this writing, more than 2,500 respondents at three different universities had each placed more than 40,000 icons on their respective campus maps, and an ongoing planning survey at Rutgers had topped 7,500 respondents.
Adapted for post-occupancy use, the myBuilding tool can include icons for larger-picture input (favorite hangout?) as well as much more granular topics: Too hot/cold; Amenities we wish we had; Room oversized/undersized; Confusing equipment or signage; Long waiting time. As with myCampus, the idea is to avoid tailoring the mapping questions, giving respondents free rein to drop icons wherever they please and add comments, as desired. And comment they do, sometimes at length, with some of the comments helpful for designers (UNDERSIZED: “For fencing, this room is just a little too narrow”) and some for owners (MISSING PIECE: “I wish we had larger mats to work out on. There is only one small mat in the back of the second floor, and it is usually overcrowded”).
After the mapping portion of the survey, respondents add traditional survey information that will offer opportunities to find splits in the data: class, gender, typical visit times, visit frequency, and any number of yes/no questions. In post-occupancy research, for example, we’d expect to always include two vital questions — Did this facility impact your decision to attend/stay at the university? — that can help recreation and university administrators quantify the building’s impact.
In a recent myBuilding post-occupancy survey, we also asked a series of questions for which respondents chose from a list of provided answers and were asked to rank them. How has the recreation center impacted you? In your opinion, what are the most important advantages of the facility’s location? What are the four most important aspects of your routine? For the owner, the goal in asking many of these questions is simply to better understand how people are using the space, with an eye toward better space management and space utilization tactics in the future, which then inform improved capital allocation decisions.
But the potential benefits are even greater, once different data sets are put together. A tool such as MyBuilding and myCampus allows administrators to merge mission-based planning, financial planning and physical planning so that these things that have traditionally been done on separate tracks get to inform one another and lead to better results.
Analyze This
Our adaptation of myCampus to post-occupancy research has come with only one hiccup — while an increasing number of university administrators have shown a willingness to grant access to student contact information when an exciting new construction project is in development, they appear to be less inclined to invite student involvement after a building has been completed. The obvious danger of only authorizing building users, or even a small subset of building users, to take part in a survey is self-selection bias — and in any case, it flies in the face of the very concept of crowdsourcing.
Thus far, faculty, staff and students who have used myBuilding are providing a lot of excitement — facility users enjoy the tool’s interactive and freeform nature — as well as data on facility management and operations that is invaluable to rec center owners. Both users and administrators have a stake in how a building can be programmed to meet demand, or how to bring in fringe groups to get excited about exercise. Respondents are not shy about getting involved and offering their opinions on these and other matters.
In the past, it wasn’t easy to get people excited about filling out surveys, and the data was difficult to compile and massage. Open forums and other face-to-face meetings netted a small amount of information that tended to be skewed, since the tendency was to err on the side of whomever in the room spoke the loudest or most passionately. We still see MyBuilding and myCampus as augmenting these other traditional methods, but it is easy to imagine crowdsourcing methods crowding out other forms of information gathering.
The ability to ask questions of a very large group of people using an interactive tool that gives them free rein to expand on their opinions anonymously sometimes elicits answers, comments, complaints and ideas that we never anticipated. Simply by asking general questions about how people use a particular space, we sometimes learn something really surprising that can inform us going forward. §
About the Author
Chris Sgarzi (csgarzi@sasaki.com) is a principal and leader of the sports practice at Sasaki Associates Inc. in Watertown, Mass.
Related Stories
MFPRO+ News | Aug 14, 2024
Report outlines how Atlanta can collaborate with private sector to spur more housing construction
A report by an Urban Land Institute’s Advisory Services panel, commissioned by the city’s housing authority, Atlanta Housing (AH), offered ways the city could collaborate with developers to spur more housing construction.
Adaptive Reuse | Aug 14, 2024
KPF unveils design for repositioning of Norman Foster’s 8 Canada Square tower in London
8 Canada Square, a Norman Foster-designed office building that’s currently the global headquarters of HSBC Holdings, will have large sections of its façade removed to create landscaped terraces. The project, designed by KPF, will be the world’s largest transformation of an office tower into a sustainable mixed-use building.
Sustainability | Aug 14, 2024
World’s first TRUE Zero Waste for Construction-certified public project delivered in Calif.
The Contra Costa County Administration Building in Martinez, Calif., is the world’s first public project to achieve the zero-waste-focused TRUE Gold certification for construction. The TRUE Certification for Construction program, administered by Green Business Certification Inc. (GBCI), recognizes projects that achieve exceptional levels of waste reduction, reuse, and recycling.
Modular Building | Aug 13, 2024
Strategies for attainable housing design with modular construction
Urban, market-rate housing that lower-income workers can actually afford is one of our country’s biggest needs. For multifamily designers, this challenge presents several opportunities for creating housing that workers can afford on their salaries.
University Buildings | Aug 12, 2024
Planning for growing computer science programs
Driven by emerging AI developments and digital transformation in the business world, university computer science programs are projected to grow by nearly 15% by 2030.
Energy Efficiency | Aug 9, 2024
Artificial intelligence could help reduce energy consumption by as much as 40% by 2050
Artificial intelligence could help U.S. buildings to significantly reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions, according to a paper by researchers at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Sponsored | Healthcare Facilities | Aug 8, 2024
U.S. healthcare building sector trends and innovations for 2024-2025
As new medicines, treatment regimens, and clinical protocols radically alter the medical world, facilities and building environments in which they take form are similarly evolving rapidly. Innovations and trends related to products, materials, assemblies, and building systems for the U.S. healthcare building sector have opened new avenues for better care delivery. Discussions with leading healthcare architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) firms and owners-operators offer insights into some of the most promising directions. This course is worth 1.0 AIA/HSW learning unit.
Office Buildings | Aug 8, 2024
6 design trends for the legal workplace
Law firms differ from many professional organizations in their need for private offices to meet confidentiality with clients and write and review legal documents in quiet, focused environments
Data Centers | Aug 8, 2024
Global edge data center market to cross $300 billion by 2026, says JLL
Technological megatrends, including IoT and generative AI, will require computing power to be closer to data generation and consumption, fueling growth of edge IT infrastructure, according to a new JLL report.
K-12 Schools | Aug 8, 2024
New K-12 STEM center hosts robotics learning, competitions in Houston suburb
A new K-12 STEM Center in a Houston suburb is the venue for robotics learning and competitions along with education about other STEM subjects. An unused storage building was transformed into a lively space for students to immerse themselves in STEM subjects. Located in Texas City, the ISD Marathon STEM and Robotics Center is the first of its kind in the district.