Massive construction firm AECOM Technology Corporation has made a $6 billion deal to buy San Francisco-based URS Corporation, according to the Los Angeles Times. Together, the firms will form a global giant with more than $19 billion in revenue and 95,000 employees in 150 countries.
AECOM has announced that it will pay about $4 billion for URS and will take on about $2 billion in debt. Michael S. Burke, CEO of AECOM, has said that the firm will get bigger over time, but not immediately, as it will focus on paying down its debt. AECOM will pay $56.31 per URS share, and URS stockholders will receive $33 per share, 0.734 shares of AECOM common stock for each URS share.
Burke said that he expects to add employees, specifically engineers, architects, and construction managers in the company's hometown of Los Angeles, though he didn't give specific numbers, according to the Times.
AECOM generates revenue through a number of industries: architecture, construction, management, and finance. Currently, it's working on the complex for the 2016 Summer Olympics in Rio de Janeiro, as well as a stadium for the 2018 World Cup in Moscow.
URS, on the other hand, is a major player in the energy sector, and provides integrated engineering, construction and technical services. It is managing the John F. Kennedy International Airport Redevelopment Program and the Orange County Public Schools Capital Improvement Program in Orlando.
Though the companies have competed over the years, the merger gives AECOM a stronger grip on the energy and oil industries, as well as federal contracting, which brought in 34% of URS's revenue in 2013.
"The combined company will be a premier, fully integrated infrastructure firm, serving clients across a broad range of markets, including transportation, facilities, environmental, energy, water and government," URS said in a statement on the merger. "The two companies are world leaders in the infrastructure industry."
Related Stories
| Aug 9, 2022
Work-from-home trend could result in $500 billion of lost value in office real estate
Researchers find major changes in lease revenues, office occupancy, lease renewal rates.
| Aug 9, 2022
5 Lean principles of design-build
Simply put, lean is the practice of creating more value with fewer resources.
| Aug 9, 2022
Designing healthy learning environments
Studies confirm healthy environments can improve learning outcomes and student success.
Legislation | Aug 8, 2022
Inflation Reduction Act includes over $5 billion for low carbon procurement
The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, recently passed by the U.S. Senate, sets aside over $5 billion for low carbon procurement in the built environment.
| Aug 8, 2022
Mass timber and net zero design for higher education and lab buildings
When sourced from sustainably managed forests, the use of wood as a replacement for concrete and steel on larger scale construction projects has myriad economic and environmental benefits that have been thoroughly outlined in everything from academic journals to the pages of Newsweek.
AEC Tech | Aug 8, 2022
The technology balancing act
As our world reopens from COVID isolation, we are entering back into undefined territory – a form of hybrid existence.
Legislation | Aug 5, 2022
D.C. City Council moves to require net-zero construction by 2026
The Washington, D.C. City Council unanimously passed legislation that would require all new buildings and substantial renovations in D.C. to be net-zero construction by 2026.
Cultural Facilities | Aug 5, 2022
A time and a place: Telling American stories through architecture
As the United States enters the year 2026, it will commence celebrating a cycle of Sestercentennials, or 250th anniversaries, of historic and cultural events across the land.
Sponsored | | Aug 4, 2022
Brighter vistas: Next-gen tools drive sustainability toward net zero line
New technologies, innovations, and tools are opening doors for building teams interested in better and more socially responsible design.
| Aug 4, 2022
Newer materials for green, resilient building complicate insurance underwriting
Insurers can’t look to years of testing on emerging technology to assess risk.