Government work is scattered among dozens of federal civilian agencies, the Pentagon and the military branches, the 50 states, and tens of thousands of municipalities. The only thing these disparate entities have in common is a tight hold on their pocketbooks. With the federal stimulus having faded into the ether, and with state and municipal collections of sales and property taxes down, government construction at all levels will be slow to recover.“We’ll be lucky to see 2007 numbers by 2017,” says Margaret Bowker, Vice President, JE Dunn Construction.
Inside the Beltway, the GSA, the National Institutes of Health, the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are still posting RFPs, but there’s a sense that “spending has been put on hold to wait and see the outcome of the election,” says Barry Perkins, LEED AP BD+C, Vice President – Government Construction, James G. Davis Construction Corp.“Certainly the size and type of projects has changed, with more smaller renovations and retrofits than larger new construction,” he says.
SCROLL DOWN FOR GIANTS 300 GOVERNMENT FIRM RANKINGS
“We’re showing up to prebids and competing against firms that never used to pursue city or county work,” says Dennis Thompson, Executive Vice President for Business Development, Manhattan Construction Co. “Competition has increased five- or six-fold, so you see an erosion of fees.”
The result: “You have the same firms chasing a smaller pool of projects,” says Len Vetrone, Webcor Builders’ Senior Vice President for Public and Federal Work.
MAKING THE ADJUSTMENT TO GOVERNMENT WORK
For newbies to federal work, learning how to work with the bureaucracy can be an eye-opener. When the economy went into the tank in 2008, Pepper Construction Group took on its first two GSA projects—the renovation of the Mies van der Rohe-designed John C. Kluczynski Federal Building, in Chicago, and the John Weld Peck Federal Building, in Cincinnati.
“There’s just an enormous amount of paperwork, forms, and protocols that are required on government jobs compared to our private work,” says Senior Vice President Rich Tilghman, PE. “We have high-quality teams with lots of experience renovating large buildings in the private sector, and GSA recognized that,” he says, adding that the $100 million in revenue for the two projects was certainly welcome.
Even firms with decades of federal civilian and military experience have to keep constantly attuned to client needs. Reynolds Smith & Hills has been designing and maintaining facilities for NASA for 50 years. Recently, the firm replaced almost 10,000 square feet of windows in the Launch Control Center at the Kennedy Space Center, a highly sensitive project. “NASA is a wonderful client, always looking for innovative solutions, but you have to create a low-risk environment for them,” says RS&H Vice President Richard Hammett, AIA, LEED AP.
Public-private partnerships are “starting to catch on” at the state and local level, says Webcor Builders’ Vetrone. “We’re talking to some of the cities we work for in California which have major public projects with no funding, looking at how P3 could make those a reality,” he says. A recently awarded P3 for a courthouse in Long Beach has attracted a lot of interest from the local AEC community, he says.
Manhattan Construction’s Thompson says privatization seems to be gaining traction with some federal clients. His firm is serving as contracting partner in such a developer leaseback scheme for a VA clinic in Grand Rapids, Mich., with U.S. Federal Properties.
SOME BRIGHT SPOTS ON THE HORIZON
Even with budget cuts, there will still be public-sector jobs for AEC firms. For example, Webcor Builders’ Vetrone reports “a fair amount” of aviation projects in California. “The big work at LAX and Sacramento has been awarded, but SFO still has a fairly aggressive program,” he says.
Manhattan Construction’s Thompson says some state and local government agencies may be rethinking their procurement policies because “service and delivery quality have been affected” by their reliance on super-low bidders. “The trend is back to technical qualifications plus low price, but at least it’s not just low price,” he says.
Vetrone says Webcor Builders is being “pretty selective” as to which government projects it bids on. “We’re looking for clients who want to hire on a best-value basis, whether design-build or CM at risk, where your qualifications, technical competence, and people count as much as your price,” he says.
More commissioning of government and military buildings could also be a godsend for AEC firms. “We’ve done enhanced commissioning for the Air Force, and we’re finding that the buildings have a marked increase in performance,” says RS&H’s Hammett. “If anything was a no-brainer, commissioning would be it.”
Portfolio optimization is becoming much more important to governments at all levels, as they seek to reduce overhead while improving employee productivity. “They’re looking for a trifecta—asset preservation, sustainability, and innovative workplace solutions,” says Becky Greco, Principal, HGA Architects and Engineers. Public-sector clients want to emulate the corporate model of “better, faster, more cost-efficient,” she says.
Lisa Bottom, a Principal at Gensler, agrees. “Government workplaces are moving away from a hierarchical structure and embracing an open plan” based on actual space usage and employee mobility patterns, she says. The goal: flexible offices that will meet current and future needs of the workforce at all levels of government. +
TOP 25 GOVERNMENT SECTOR ARCHITECTURE FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Government Revenue ($) |
1 | HOK | 143,334,571 |
2 | Heery International | 103,832,000 |
3 | SmithGroupJJR | 77,652,837 |
4 | IBI Group | 57,347,163 |
5 | Perkins+Will | 48,059,661 |
6 | HDR Architecture | 46,000,000 |
7 | EYP Architecture & Engineering | 40,892,580 |
8 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill | 33,907,000 |
9 | HNTB Architecture | 31,338,712 |
10 | PageSoutherlandPage | 27,263,377 |
11 | NBBJ | 24,958,000 |
12 | LEO A DALY | 24,141,694 |
13 | Hammel, Green and Abrahamson | 24,028,000 |
14 | PGAL | 24,018,100 |
15 | Reynolds, Smith and Hills | 18,900,000 |
16 | ZGF Architects | 17,653,791 |
17 | RTKL Associates | 17,075,180 |
18 | DLR Group | 17,000,000 |
19 | Gensler | 17,000,000 |
20 | Moseley Architects | 13,700,000 |
21 | Beyer Blinder Belle Architects & Planners | 12,450,000 |
22 | Sasaki Associates | 12,356,441 |
23 | Cannon Design | 12,000,000 |
24 | KMD Architects | 11,913,372 |
25 | Fentress Architects | 11,830,262 |
TOP 25 GOVERNMENT SECTOR ENGINEERING FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Government Revenue ($) |
1 | AECOM Technology Corp. | 2,485,000,000 |
2 | Fluor Corp. | 1,127,862,000 |
3 | Jacobs | 924,100,000 |
4 | URS Corp. | 309,987,000 |
5 | STV | 133,396,000 |
6 | Stantec | 117,000,000 |
7 | Dewberry | 57,006,253 |
8 | Atkins North America | 43,330,846 |
9 | Parsons Brinckerhoff | 35,515,523 |
10 | H&A Architects & Engineers | 31,641,856 |
11 | Michael Baker Jr., Inc. | 30,830,000 |
12 | Science Applications International Corp. | 15,431,116 |
13 | Walter P Moore | 12,531,123 |
14 | Coffman Engineers | 12,400,000 |
15 | SSOE Group | 12,321,198 |
16 | WSP USA | 10,900,000 |
17 | Arup | 10,580,870 |
18 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | 8,528,328 |
19 | Sebesta Blomberg | 8,450,225 |
20 | Interface Engineering | 8,103,067 |
21 | Walker Parking Consultants | 7,887,763 |
22 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | 7,800,000 |
23 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | 7,000,000 |
24 | RMF Engineering | 7,000,000 |
25 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | 6,936,000 |
TOP 25 GOVERNMENT SECTOR CONSTRUCTION FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Government Revenue ($) |
1 | Turner Corporation, The | 2,268,320,925 |
2 | Jacobs | 924,100,000 |
3 | Clark Group | 850,491,577 |
4 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | 749,080,537 |
5 | Gilbane Building Co. | 736,199,000 |
6 | Hensel Phelps Construction | 669,080,000 |
7 | Walsh Group, The | 552,751,904 |
8 | Skanska USA | 550,758,448 |
9 | Webcor Builders | 484,567,966 |
10 | Tutor Perini | 385,311,000 |
11 | Balfour Beatty US | 341,774,742 |
12 | URS Corp. | 309,987,000 |
13 | Manhattan Construction Group | 274,683,334 |
14 | Alberici Corp. | 247,423,509 |
15 | PCL Construction Enterprises | 245,007,223 |
16 | Mortenson | 233,863,000 |
17 | Flintco | 223,200,000 |
18 | McCarthy Holdings | 218,000,000 |
19 | James G. Davis Construction | 208,000,000 |
20 | Yates Companies, The | 187,800,000 |
21 | Ryan Companies US | 156,858,437 |
22 | DPR Construction | 146,889,203 |
23 | JE Dunn Construction | 135,637,557 |
24 | Sundt Construction | 100,393,850 |
25 | CORE Construction | 94,340,532 |
Related Stories
| Aug 11, 2010
29 Great Solutions for the AEC Industry
AEC firms are hotbeds of invention and innovation to meet client needs in today's highly competitive environment. The editors of Building Design+Construction are pleased to present 29 "Great Solutions" to some of the most complex problems and issues facing Building Teams today. Our solutions cover eight key areas: Design, BIM + IT, Collaboration, Healthcare, Products, Technology, Business Management, and Green Building.
| Aug 11, 2010
Permanent tribute to Daniel Burnham and his Plan of Chicago proposed for Grant Park Museum Campus
The first-place winner of a design competition for a public memorial celebrating Daniel Burnham's impact on Chicago will be announced at a news conference Wednesday, July 8, at 10am CDT. The proposed site for the memorial is on the Museum Campus just north of The Field Museum. The announcement comes after nearly two years of planning by Chicago's architecture, design and urban planning community about how to best honor the legacy of Burnham and the Plan of Chicago he co-wrote with Edward Bennett.
| Aug 11, 2010
Arup, SOM top BD+C's ranking of the country's largest mixed-use design firms
A ranking of the Top 75 Mixed-Use Design Firms based on Building Design+Construction's 2009 Giants 300 survey. For more Giants 300 rankings, visit http://www.BDCnetwork.com/Giants
| Aug 11, 2010
Architecture billings index takes turn for the worse
After showing signs of stabilization over the last three months, the Architecture Billings Index (ABI) plunged nearly five points in June. As a leading economic indicator of construction activity, the ABI reflects the approximate nine to twelve month lag time between architecture billings and construction spending. The American Institute of Architects (AIA) reported the June ABI rating was 37.7, far lower than the 42.9 the previous month.
| Aug 11, 2010
International Living Building Institute established to advance 'living buildings'
The idea of a Living Building, a high-performance building that produces its own power and cleans and reuses all of its water, is gaining momentum around the world. In an effort to oversee the global development of Living Buildings, the International Living Building Institute (ILBI) has been established.
| Aug 11, 2010
Populous selected to design 'crystalline skin' stadium for 2014 Winter Olympics
Russian officials have selected global architect Populous to design the main stadium for the 2014 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games in Sochi, Russia. The 40,000-seat stadium will feature a crystalline skin that "engages with its surroundings by day and provides an iconic representation of the color and spectacle of the games when illuminated at night," said Populous senior principal John Barrow.
| Aug 11, 2010
M&A deal volume down 67% in engineering/construction sector: PricewaterhouseCoopers
Global Economic Uncertainty Results in Sluggish Deal Activity in U.S.; China Shows Significant Opportunity for Growth
| Aug 11, 2010
Three Opus Corporation companies file for bankruptcy
Opus Corporation, a developer headquartered in Minnetonka, Minn., filed for bankruptcy in three of its five regional operating companies: Opus East, Opus South, and Opus West. CEO Mark Rauenhorst said sharp declines in commercial real estate values and tight credit markets caused difficulties in refinancing assets and restructuring lending agreements.