flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Addressing client concerns about design-assist

Building Team

Addressing client concerns about design-assist

Common concerns about DA include lack of familiarity, obtaining competitive pricing, and design liability.


By Tom Garske, Jennifer Horvath, Ed Keener, Stephen Metz, Jeff Ortman, Randy Sleeper, Kurt Smith, and Monica Wangler | Ohio Construction Transformation Consortium | July 11, 2016

Construction in Miami in July 2016. Photo: Phillip Pessar/Creative Commons.

Design-assist is not without potential drawbacks. Here are some common concerns—and how your Building Team can reassure clients that DA is worth considering.

OWNER CONCERN: Lack of familiarity with design-assist. DA is a relatively new delivery model. Architects and CMs may have a tendency to revert back to traditional roles.

PLAN OF ACTION: Although the DA process produces a more efficient, collaborative design process, care must be taken to ensure that the collaborative process continues throughout construction. During construction, there are inevitable owner concerns. That’s why it’s important to have established a process to address these changes. The collaborative process can be used to resolve challenges in a quick, cost-effective manner.

OWNER CONCERN: Subcontract administration. The subcontractor might not perform as expected or fall out of line with the budget.

PLAN OF ACTION: It is important to administer a preconstruction contract with the DA subcontractor, which allows the owner to terminate the agreement at any time prior to construction. This acts as a safeguard when a subcontractor’s pricing is not in line with the budget, and there is no reasonable way to get to the budget; in such a case, the owner would have reasonable cause to terminate the subcontractor’s contract. In this situation the trade package would need to be bid, which could push back the schedule depending on the selection process.

OWNER CONCERN: Obtaining competitive pricing. Some owners believe early involvement with subcontractors and the construction manager in the project precludes them from receiving competitive bids.

PLAN OF ACTION: Because the construction team is hired early in the design phase, the Building Team can obtain benchmark prices during the programming phase, making competitive pricing feasible. The Building Team can also obtain nonbinding preliminary price proposals during the DA selection process based on initial plans, such as schematic drawings; binding final prices can be submitted upon completion of the plans.

OWNER CONCERN: Added costs of the DA process. Design-assist may add time and cost to the design phase of the project due to additional collaboration with subcontractors and added time to procure services.

PLAN OF ACTION: The reductions achieved in construction cost and schedule should offset additional costs during the design phases, making design-assist advantageous overall.

OWNER CONCERN: Design liability. Greater collaboration among the architect, engineer, subcontractors, and construction manager might raise questions about who has responsibilities and design liability throughout the process.

PLAN OF ACTION: The project team should clearly set obligations and liabilities of the team members with respect to plans, specifications, and the building information model (if applicable) to overcome this concern. You should also develop a design-assist execution plan to identify roles, responsibilities, and deliverables for all team members.

Related Stories

Building Team | Jan 10, 2019

Skilled labor shortages continue to make off-site fabrication and construction attractive

But the AEC industry’s “culture” impedes greater acceptance, according to a recent National Institute of Building Sciences survey.

Building Team | Jan 7, 2019

2019 outlook: Firms not betting on another record-setting year

Despite the positive indicators for the market, AEC professionals remain largely cautious when it comes to growth prospects for 2019.

Building Team | Jan 4, 2019

Design-build delivery is setting new parameters for project management

FMI paper provides clues to what makes these contracts click (or not).

Building Team | Dec 11, 2018

And then there were two: HQ2 sites, in hindsight, seemed obvious

The two cities already had the greatest number of Amazon employees outside of Seattle.

Building Team | Oct 16, 2018

Dead lobby syndrome: An affliction only experience can cure

The competition for great tenants has rarely been as fierce as it is today.

Building Team | Aug 21, 2018

Five habits that are keeping your digital strategy from working

Strategies are always created with the best of intentions for improving business, the effort involved in executing the strategy – especially ones involving disruptive digital capabilities – is greatly underestimated.

Building Team | Aug 17, 2018

Silicon Valley is here. Get over it.

AEC firms continue to have angst about a tech-industry takeover of the market. One expert’s advice: “Embrace technology. Do not fear. You can shape it.”

Sponsored | Building Materials | Aug 1, 2018

Building for now... and the future

Metal building systems are often selected for large-sized structures, and with good reason.

Building Team | Jul 30, 2018

Construction tech is the new investment darling for VC funds

In the first half of 2018, venture capital firms invested $1.05 billion in global construction tech startups, setting a record high.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




Giants 400

Top 75 Engineering Firms for 2023

Kimley-Horn, WSP, Tetra Tech, Langan, and IMEG head the rankings of the nation's largest engineering firms for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021