flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

7 towers that define the 'skinny skyscraper' boom [slideshow]

7 towers that define the 'skinny skyscraper' boom [slideshow]

New York and Melbourne are leading the charge with six super-slender towers in the works. 


By BD+C Staff | February 5, 2014
Designed by Bjarke Ingels Group and James KM Cheng Architects, the 49-story Beach & Howe Tower in Vancouver features a twisting,

Recent advancements in structural design, combined with the loosening of density and zoning requirements, has opened the door for the so-called "superslim skyscraper."  

From New York to Melbourne to Vancouver, developers are planning high-rise structures on postage-stamp-sized parcels (OK, not that small, but we're talking lots as narrow as 22 feet) in dense urban locations. 

Developers love the building type because they can finally take advantage of land that was previously unusable for large multifamily and mixed-use structures.

Some projects, like the Beach & Howe Tower in Vancouver (see No. 2 below), utilize a narrow form to accommodate multiple structures on a given site.

To be considered "superthin" or "slender," a tower must have a height-to-width ratio of at least 10:1. A typical skyscraper, such as the Willis Tower, falls in the 7:1 range. The new crop of skinny towers blows those ratios out of the water. For example, the 111 West 57th Street project in New York City has a height-to-width ratio of 22.5:1.

Here's a quick look at some prominent skinny skyscraper projects in the works:

 

1. 111 West 57th Street, New York

Building Type: multifamily (100 units)
Height: 1,350 feet, 77 fours
Width: 60 feet

Building Team
Developer: JDS Development
Architect: SHoP Architects
Structural engineer: WSP Cantor Seinuk

More on 111 West 57th Street via CTBUH's Skyscraper Center

 

 

 

2. Beach & Howe Tower, Vancouver

Building Type: multifamily (407 units)
Height: 493 feet, 49 floors
Width: NA

Building Team
Developer: Westbank Corp.
Architects: Bjarke Ingels Group (BIG), James KM Cheng Architects
Structural engineer: Glotman Simpson Group
MEP engineer: Cobalt Engineering

More on the Beach & Howe Tower via CTBUH's Skyscraper Center

 

 

 

3. Phoenix Apartments, Melbourne, Australia

Building Type: multifamily (28 units)
Height: 290 feet, 29 floors
Width: 21 feet, 11 inches

Building Team
Developer: Equiset
Architect: Fender Katsalidis Architects

More on the Phoenix Apartments via Sidney Morning Herald

 

 

 

4. One57, New York

Building Type: mixed use, with hotel (210 rooms) and multifamily (92 units)
Height: 1,005 feet, 79 floors
Width: NA

Building Team
Developer: Extell Development Company
Design architect: Christian de Portzamparc
Executive architect: SLCE Architect LLP
Structural engineer: WSP Cantor Seinuk
MEP engineer: AKF Engineers
Exterior performance consultant: Israel Berger Associates
Interior designers: Yabu Pushelberg (hotel), Thomas Juul-Hansen, LLC (residential)
Contractor: Bovis Lend Lease

More on One57 via CTBUH's Skyscraper Center

 

 

 

5. 464 Collins Street, Melbourne

Building Type: mixed use, with multifamily (37 floors, 185 units) and office (13 floors)
Height: 593 feet, 50 floors
Width: 36 feet, 1 inch

Building Team
Developer: Equiset
Architect: Bates Smart

More on 464 Collins Street via Urban Melbourne

 

 

 

6. 432 Park Avenue, New York

Building type: multifamily (125 units)
Height: 1,397 feet, 85 floors
Width: 50 feet

Building Team
Developers: CIM Group, Macklowe Properties
Architects: Rafael Vinoly Architects, SLCE Architects
Structural engineer: WSP Cantor Seinuk
MEP engineer: WSP Flack + Kurtz
Contractor: Bovis Lend Lease

More on 432 Park Avenue via CTBUH's Skyscraper Center

 

 

7. 54 Clarke Street, Melbourne

Building Type: multifamily (256 units)
Height: 787 feet, 73 floors
Width: 39 feet, 4 inches

Building Team
Developer: Matrix & Cube
Architect: BKK Architects
Structural engineer: Macleod Consulting

More on 54 Clarke Street via Urban Melbourne

Related Stories

| Jul 20, 2012

2012 Giants 300 Special Report

Ranking the leading firms in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction.

| Jul 20, 2012

Data Centers Report: Demand ‘exploding’

BD+C's Giants 300 Top 25 AEC Firms in the Data Center sector.

| Jul 20, 2012

Office Report: Fitouts, renovations keep sector moving

BD+C's Giants 300 Top 25 AEC Firms in the Office sector.

| Jul 20, 2012

K-12 Schools Report: ‘A lot of pent-up need,’ with optimism for ’13

The Giants 300 Top 25 AEC Firms in the K-12 Schools Sector.

| Jul 20, 2012

Higher education market holding steady

But Giants 300 University AEC Firms aren’t expecting a flood of new work.

| Jul 20, 2012

3 important trends in hospital design that Healthcare Giants are watching closely

BD+C’s Giants 300 reveals top AEC firms in the healthcare sector.

| Jul 20, 2012

Global boom for hotels; for retail, not so much

The Giants 300 Top 10 Firms in the Hospitality and Retail sectors.

| Jul 20, 2012

Firms bracing for DoD cuts

The Giants 300 Top 25 AEC Firms in the Military sector.

| Jul 20, 2012

Gensler, Stantec, Turner lead ‘green’ firms

The Top 10 AEC Firms in Green Buildings and LEED Accredited Staff.

| Jul 19, 2012

Renovation resurgence cuts across sectors

Giants 300 reconstruction sector firms ‘pumping fresh blood in tired spaces.’

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021