flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

6 myths holding back green building

Green

6 myths holding back green building

Sustainable design has proven benefits, so why isn’t it more widely adopted?


By BD+C Staff | March 22, 2015
6 myths holding back green building

1225 Connecticut Avenue NW is an office building in the Dupont Circle neighborhood of Washington, D.C. Built in 1968, with a $32 million renovation in 2009 by Brookfield Properties and RTKL Associates. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Green building has not gotten as much traction as it should, given its many benefits, writes Lance Hosey, Chief Sustainability Officer with RTKL.

Despite reports that LEED-certified buildings can cut greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption by half, while costing 25% less to operate, only about 1% of the U.S. building stock is green. Hosey attributes this situation to six misperceptions about sustainable design:

1. Myth: Sustainability Equals Environmentalism. Reality: Green design is not just for tree huggers. It also produces economic value.

2. Myth: Sustainability Equals Technology. Reality: Sustainability is not just about solar panels and wind turbines.

3. Myth: Sustainable Design Costs Too Much. Reality: Today, LEED-certified buildings can be built at the same cost or even lower cost than conventional construction.

4. Myth: Sustainable Design Takes More Time. Reality: Integrated design, which brings together a project's key stakeholders, designers, consultants and contractors early to get consensus on goals, can save time by ensuring more thorough coordination and avoiding costly changes later.

5. Myth: Sustainability Isn't About Design. Reality: Green design is not just about specifications in a technical manual. For instance, decisions about a building’s shape have a significant impact on the resources needed.

6. Myth: Sustainable Design Isn't Beautiful. Reality: The look and feel of design are essential to sustainability. “Following the lessons of sustainability to their logical conclusion will inspire more designers to reconsider the impact of every decision, including form and image,” Hosey says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jan 2, 2020

White paper focuses on Metal Composite Material labeling

Document part of effort to uphold industry standards for the product.

Codes and Standards | Dec 18, 2019

Hard Rock Hotel collapse in New Orleans puts spotlight on undocumented workers

Having helped rebuild the city after Hurricane Katrina, many under threat of deportation.

Codes and Standards | Dec 18, 2019

Maryland lawmakers take on blocked sidewalks during construction projects

Legislation clarifies developers’ responsibilities.

Codes and Standards | Dec 18, 2019

New York City passes legislation to prevent bird strikes on buildings

Requires bird-safe materials on first 75 feet of a structure.

Codes and Standards | Dec 16, 2019

New Buildings Institute seeks entries for Zero Buildings Database

Listing illustrates feasibility of ultra low-energy buildings.

Codes and Standards | Dec 13, 2019

USGBC launches new tool to prioritize sustainability strategies

Highlights building design features that can lead to better performance.

Codes and Standards | Dec 12, 2019

Coalition calls for consistent building data disclosure regulations in Canada

Major real estate firms are driving the effort.

Codes and Standards | Dec 10, 2019

Utilities rolling out more grid-interactive efficient building programs

Focus is on energy savings and demand flexibility.

Codes and Standards | Dec 9, 2019

Canada’s Zero Carbon Building Standard reports first 10 certifications

Projects include new and existing offices, schools, and warehouses.

Codes and Standards | Dec 6, 2019

New research examines flood mitigation policies in the U.S.

Thirteen states or cities have adopted effective measures; some restricting development in vulnerable areas.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.



halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021