flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

6 myths holding back green building

Green

6 myths holding back green building

Sustainable design has proven benefits, so why isn’t it more widely adopted?


By BD+C Staff | March 22, 2015
6 myths holding back green building

1225 Connecticut Avenue NW is an office building in the Dupont Circle neighborhood of Washington, D.C. Built in 1968, with a $32 million renovation in 2009 by Brookfield Properties and RTKL Associates. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Green building has not gotten as much traction as it should, given its many benefits, writes Lance Hosey, Chief Sustainability Officer with RTKL.

Despite reports that LEED-certified buildings can cut greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption by half, while costing 25% less to operate, only about 1% of the U.S. building stock is green. Hosey attributes this situation to six misperceptions about sustainable design:

1. Myth: Sustainability Equals Environmentalism. Reality: Green design is not just for tree huggers. It also produces economic value.

2. Myth: Sustainability Equals Technology. Reality: Sustainability is not just about solar panels and wind turbines.

3. Myth: Sustainable Design Costs Too Much. Reality: Today, LEED-certified buildings can be built at the same cost or even lower cost than conventional construction.

4. Myth: Sustainable Design Takes More Time. Reality: Integrated design, which brings together a project's key stakeholders, designers, consultants and contractors early to get consensus on goals, can save time by ensuring more thorough coordination and avoiding costly changes later.

5. Myth: Sustainability Isn't About Design. Reality: Green design is not just about specifications in a technical manual. For instance, decisions about a building’s shape have a significant impact on the resources needed.

6. Myth: Sustainable Design Isn't Beautiful. Reality: The look and feel of design are essential to sustainability. “Following the lessons of sustainability to their logical conclusion will inspire more designers to reconsider the impact of every decision, including form and image,” Hosey says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | May 18, 2020

Strategies to reduce personal contact in multifamily properties

Design can improve health amid COVID-19 pandemic.

Codes and Standards | May 18, 2020

Canada Green Building Council says building industry lacks zero-carbon skills, knowledge

Net-zero target requires shift in thinking and practices.

Codes and Standards | May 18, 2020

California’s grid can support all-electric buildings

Load-shifting will help reduce peak demand.

Codes and Standards | May 15, 2020

European cities to revamp transportation after pandemic reopening

Road closures, new rules for public transit will be imposed.

Codes and Standards | May 14, 2020

Washington State construction industry restart plan has three phases

In state with earliest COVID-19 cases, advisory group developing priorities based on risk.

Codes and Standards | May 14, 2020

More mass timber beam and column options available in the U.S.

Freres Lumber unveils new line of structural elements suitable for high-rise buildings.

Codes and Standards | May 13, 2020

Researchers flag insufficient training for construction workers on healthcare projects

May contribute to fungal disease outbreaks that endanger patients

Codes and Standards | May 8, 2020

New NIBS report evaluates natural disaster mitigation strategies

Document examines strengthening buildings for flood, wind, wildfires, and earthquakes.

Codes and Standards | May 6, 2020

A few ways contractors can manage COVID-19 risks

Staggered start times, rigorous tool cleaning, virtual training among the strategies.

Codes and Standards | May 5, 2020

NAHB loses influence in 2021 IECC building code development

Despite objections from the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), the development of the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) is nearing conclusion. NAHB objected to several more stringent energy efficiency provisions.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.



halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021