flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

6 myths holding back green building

Green

6 myths holding back green building

Sustainable design has proven benefits, so why isn’t it more widely adopted?


By BD+C Staff | March 22, 2015
6 myths holding back green building

1225 Connecticut Avenue NW is an office building in the Dupont Circle neighborhood of Washington, D.C. Built in 1968, with a $32 million renovation in 2009 by Brookfield Properties and RTKL Associates. Photo: Wikimedia Commons

Green building has not gotten as much traction as it should, given its many benefits, writes Lance Hosey, Chief Sustainability Officer with RTKL.

Despite reports that LEED-certified buildings can cut greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption by half, while costing 25% less to operate, only about 1% of the U.S. building stock is green. Hosey attributes this situation to six misperceptions about sustainable design:

1. Myth: Sustainability Equals Environmentalism. Reality: Green design is not just for tree huggers. It also produces economic value.

2. Myth: Sustainability Equals Technology. Reality: Sustainability is not just about solar panels and wind turbines.

3. Myth: Sustainable Design Costs Too Much. Reality: Today, LEED-certified buildings can be built at the same cost or even lower cost than conventional construction.

4. Myth: Sustainable Design Takes More Time. Reality: Integrated design, which brings together a project's key stakeholders, designers, consultants and contractors early to get consensus on goals, can save time by ensuring more thorough coordination and avoiding costly changes later.

5. Myth: Sustainability Isn't About Design. Reality: Green design is not just about specifications in a technical manual. For instance, decisions about a building’s shape have a significant impact on the resources needed.

6. Myth: Sustainable Design Isn't Beautiful. Reality: The look and feel of design are essential to sustainability. “Following the lessons of sustainability to their logical conclusion will inspire more designers to reconsider the impact of every decision, including form and image,” Hosey says.

Related Stories

Green | Apr 4, 2016

AIA report analyzes 20 years of the best green projects

"Lessons from the Leading Edge" is a study of the 200 Committee on the Environment (COTE) Top Ten Award winning projects since 1997.

Green | Mar 15, 2016

Living Future Institute launches Biophilic Design Initiative

Goal is to transfer biophilic design theory to real-world applications.

Green | Mar 11, 2016

GE wants to use carbon dioxide from the atmosphere as a means of storing solar energy

Carbon dioxide has been captured and stored by scientists for years, but now GE has a novel idea for how to put this stored CO2 to use.

Green | Feb 29, 2016

Nedlaw Living Wall Biofilter creates green space for manufacturer's showroom

The 640-sf living wall biofilter provides cleansed air for the office building and provides a stunning focal point in this modern space.

Green | Feb 18, 2016

Best laid plans: Masdar City’s dreams of being the first net-zero city may have disappeared

The $22 billion experiment, to this point, has produced less than stellar results.

Green | Feb 1, 2016

Supreme Court ruling on demand response expected to benefit smart grid

Ruling allows PV owners and other small energy generators to continue to be paid wholesale rates for power they generate.

Green | Jan 29, 2016

USGBC names top 10 states for LEED green building

Illinois leads the list for the third straight year.

Green | Jan 4, 2016

Florida lagging on development of green roofs

Florida lagging on development of green roofs.

Green | Dec 23, 2015

Austin, Texas mandates construction recycling

Projects larger than 5,000 sf must recycle or salvage at least half of their trash.  

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021