Claims, disputes, arbitration, litigation: these are dreaded procedural pitfalls that often dog construction projects large and small. Not only are they time-consuming to work through, but they’re costly, too: The National Research Council estimates that $4B to $11B is spent annually in resolving these cases in the U.S. market.
At the North American office of Rider Levett Bucknall, the approach we take to avoid or minimize the number of conflicts that end up in post-project arbitration or litigation dispute often centers on using Project Neutrals or independent Dispute Review Boards (DRB).
These individuals are trained, neutral advisors who focus solely on the project, not on any one party’s position. Part psychiatrist, part negotiator, DRBs and Project Neutrals understand, manage, and resolve conflicts caused by normal construction processes in order to avoid disputes. They work with owners, architects, contractors, and consultants to transition the industry-collective mindset from conflict to conflict resolution, and ultimately to dispute avoidance.
Here are five core practices that Project Neutrals and DRBs utilize to keep the peace, while keeping a project on-track.
1. Develop trusting relationships with each stakeholder. When trust levels are high, people tend to be less defensive and are more willing to share information to help find a mutually acceptable solution to a problem. If parties mistrust one another, they often act defensively, focusing solely on their own needs and interests. Creating a working relationship that is trust-based makes conflict management and resolution easier.
2. Play an active, integrated role in the overall project team. If you want to be prepared to handle conflicts, it’s important not to sit passively on the sidelines during the design and construction process. Connecting regularly—through meetings, emails, and phone calls—with key players from the start of a project can establish you as a familiar, concerned, and impartial presence, rather than a biased opportunist or outlier.
3. Communicate clearly. The sheer quantity of documentation and communication generated by construction projects can be massive; the quality of those documents, in terms of clarity and meaning, can be ambiguous, inflammatory, or even overwhelming. Using simple and considerate language can avoid small misunderstandings—and keep them from escalating into major conflicts.
4. Treat all parties equally and fairly. If you demonstrate competence, honesty, and respect for the project and all its stakeholders, people will be confident in your ability to protect their interests and provide fair advice, recommendations, and guidance. This empowers each party to be open to conflict resolution, secure in the knowledge that, if necessary, you can be relied upon to provide sincere and balanced feedback.
5. Serve as a resource to help stakeholders explore mutually acceptable solutions.It’s not easy to challenge the traditionally adversarial culture of the construction industry. If you present people with reasonable and effective options to the expensive, ingrained blame game that pervades the business, you’ll earn the esteem of your professional colleagues and be recognized as a leader in the field.
Employed regularly, these fundamental dispute-avoidance techniques can bring a new harmony to construction projects, resulting in streamlined schedules and enhanced bottom lines.
About the Author: John T. Jozwick, Esq., is Senior Vice President and General Counsel for Rider Levett Bucknall North America. With more than 35 years in the industry, Jozwick provides advisory services to owners, contractors, subcontractors, design professionals, sureties, and attorneys relating to construction projects and disputes. He serves clients as an expert witness, provides alternative dispute resolution services as Arbitrator or Mediator, and provides construction dispute avoidance services as a Dispute Review Board member, Project Neutral, or Independent Certifier.
Related Stories
| Jul 16, 2013
As the U.S. economy sputters back to life, contractors wait for the green light on projects [2013 Giants 300 Report]
There are enough positive indictors in the economy to justify greenlighting projects, but building owners and developers remain reluctant to pull the trigger.
| Jul 16, 2013
Top Construction Management Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
URS, STV, JE Dunn top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest construction management and project management firms in the United States.
| Jul 16, 2013
Top Contractors [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Turner, Fluor, Skanska top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest contractors in the United States.
| Jul 16, 2013
Robotics: A new way to demolish buildings
A robot prototype uses water jets to break up concrete structures and then sucks up the water and debris for reuse and recycling.
| Jul 15, 2013
Zaha Hadid unveils plan for boutique condo development in New York
Related Companies taps the London-based architect for the 11-story 520 West 28th Street residential development adjacent to the High Line in Chelsea.
| Jul 15, 2013
Driggs named to lead Heery International
Rich Driggs has been named President of Heery International, following Bill Heitz, who retired on July 1st after 34 years with the company. Driggs is only the fourth leader of Heery International since George Heery founded the firm in 1952.
| Jul 12, 2013
12 award-winning healthcare projects [slideshow]
AIA's Academy of Architecture for Health announced the recipients of the 2013 AIA National Healthcare Design Awards.
| Jul 11, 2013
Pennsylvania legislators work on bill to update demolition codes following fatal building collapse
Pennsylvania lawmakers are working on a bill to update demolition codes, in the wake of a fatal building collapse in Philadelphia in June.
| Jul 11, 2013
Lawsuit challenges modular apartment project in New York City
A plan to build pre-fab apartment buildings at Atlantic Yards in Brooklyn, N.Y., has been challenged by a lawsuit filed by the Plumbing Foundation in Manhattan Supreme Court.