Low-emissivity (low-e) glasses are critical to making today’s buildings brighter, more energy-efficient and more sustainable. By controlling solar heat gain and promoting daylighting, they help buildings use less energy for temperature control and lighting, while adding the human benefits associated with outdoor views and more pleasant working and living environments.
Here are five tips to help architects, engineers, and contractors understand and explain the differences among low-e glasses and their impact on building performance:
1. E = Emissivity. Emissivity refers to the relative ability of a material’s surface to radiate energy. Low-e glass has a microscopically thin coating that lowers the emissivity of the glass surface and is engineered to transmit energy from the visible light portion of the solar spectrum (between 380 and 780 nanometers), while reflecting energy from ultraviolet light (310 to 380 nanometers), which causes fading, and infrared light (above 780 nanometers), which makes buildings warmer.
2. Think of a thermos. A thermos works by using a silver lining to continuously reflect and maintain the temperature of the drink it contains. Low-e glasses function according to the same principal, using multiple layers of silver or other low-emissivity materials in the coating to keep heat inside a building or prevent it from entering. Similarly, thermoses and insulating glass units (IGUs) are both designed with air spaces that provide a layer of insulation between the inside and outside.
CLICK IMAGE TO ENLARGE
3. More slivers of silver. Low-e coatings incorporate multiple layers of silver (or other low- emissivity materials) to control the transmission and reflection of heat and light. Recent technical advances now enable glass manufacturers to deposit up to three layers of silver on the glass substrate, which has enhanced the solar control capability of low-e glasses without diminishing their ability to transmit light.
4. Passive for insulation. Passive low-e glasses are usually made using the pyrolitic process, which means the coating is applied while the molten glass ribbon is still on the float line. This produces a “hard” coat that is fused to the glass surface and highly durable, but which has a higher emissivity that a solar-control low-e glass. Passive low-e glasses have decent insulating capabilities, but because of the limitations of metal deposition on the float line, they permit more solar infrared energy (heat) to pass through their coatings and become trapped inside the building. Consequently, passive low-e glasses are often the best choice for cold, heating-dominated climates.
5. Solar control to reduce heat gain. Coatings for solar control, low-e glasses are applied to pre-cut sheets of glass in a vacuum chamber at room temperature. This gives glass manufacturers the ability to deposit more sophisticated coatings (with multiple layers of silver) on the glass substrate, which improves solar control of the infrared (heat) portion of the solar spectrum without substantially diminishing the transmittance of visible light. These coatings are the best choice for hot, cooling-dominated (and moderate) climates. The lower emissivity of solar control low-e glasses also provides better insulating values to maintain the interior temperatures.
To learn more about low-e glass and other topics related to designing, specifying and building with glass, visit the PPG Glass Education Center at http://educationcenter.ppg.
Related Stories
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Convention Center Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. convention center sector
AECOM, Gensler, and Jacobs head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest convention center sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Reconstruction Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. building reconstruction and renovation sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and STO Building Group head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest reconstruction sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 K-12 School Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. K-12 school facilities sector
AECOM, Gilbane, and PBK head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest K-12 school facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Sports Facilities Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. sports facilities sector
Kimley-Horn, Mortenson, and Populous top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest sports facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Office Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. office building sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and STO Building Group head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest office building sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Hotel Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. hospitality sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and Suffolk Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest hotel sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Healthcare Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. healthcare facilities sector
HDR, Jacobs, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest healthcare facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Government Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. government buildings sector
HNTB, Jacobs, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest government sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Cultural Facilities Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. cultural facilities sector
AECOM, Arup, and Populous head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest cultural facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 2, 2020
2020 Retail Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. retail building sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and PCL Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest retail sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
