flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

5 most (and least) expensive commercial real estate markets

5 most (and least) expensive commercial real estate markets

With an average cost per square foot of $16.11, Stamford, Conn., is the most costly U.S. market for commercial real estate, according to a BOMA report. 


By BOMA | August 23, 2013

With an average cost per square foot of $16.11, Stamford, Conn., is the most costly U.S. market for commercial real estate, according to a new study by the Building Owners and Managers Association International. New York and San Francisco are also among the nation's priciest markets. 

Using the results from the BOMA 2013 Experience Exchange Report, the group compiled a list of the most and least expensive commercial real estate city-markets in the United States.  The annual report aggregates rental income and operating expense figures from the previous year; in 2012, data was gathered from more than 5,300 buildings across 250 markets and 115 cities in the United States and Canada.

Five most expensive city-markets – total operating expenses:

1. Stamford, Conn. $16.11 per square foot (psf)
2. New York $11.80 psf
3. Grand Rapids, Mich. $11.16 psf
4. Newark, N.J. $10.34 psf
5. San Francisco $9.66 psf

Five least expensive city-markets – total operating expenses:

1. Stockton, Calif. $3.57 psf
2. Fresno, Calif. $3.61 psf
3. Huntsville, Ala. $4.31 psf
4. Virginia Beach, Va. $4.64 psf
5. Albuquerque, N.M. $4.80 psf

Total operating expenses incorporate all expenses incurred to operate office buildings, including utilities, repairs and maintenance, roads and grounds, cleaning, administration, and security. Fixed expenses include real estate taxes, property taxes and insurance.  

There was a 3.9 percent overall decrease in total operating expenses from 2011 to 2012, underscoring an industry focus on maximizing building efficiency in the face of dwindling income streams. For example, New York, which topped the list of most expensive markets for operating expenses last year, saw a decrease of $0.66 per square foot.

Five most expensive city-markets – total rental income:

1. Washington, D.C. $44.30 psf
2. New York $39.00 psf
3. San Mateo, Calif. $34.96 psf
4. San Francisco $34.49 psf
5. Santa Monica, Calif. $34.04 psf

Five least expensive city-markets – total rental income:

1. Macon, Ga. $8.16 psf
2. Shreveport, La. $11.18 psf
3. Columbus, Ohio $12.09 psf
4. Huntsville, Ala. $12.81 psf
5. Little Rock, Ark. $12.81 psf

Total rental income includes rental income from office, retail and other space, such as storage areas. 

While average rental income has dropped somewhat, decreasing 2.9 percent from 2011 to 2012, building owners and managers are compensating for these income losses with greater reductions in expenses.

The Experience Exchange Report is the premier income and expense data benchmarking tool for the commercial real estate industry. The EER allows users to conduct multi-year analysis of single markets and select multiple cities to generate state and regional reports.  It also offers the capability to search by building size, height, age and more for broader analysis. Subscriptions are available at www.bomaeer.com.

About BOMA International
The Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) International is a federation of 93 BOMA U.S. associations, BOMA Canada and its 11 regional associations and 13 BOMA international affiliates.  Founded in 1907, BOMA represents the owners and managers of all commercial property types, including nearly 10 billion square feet of U.S. office space that supports 3.7 million jobs and contributes $205 billion to the U.S. GDP.  Its mission is to advance the interests of the entire commercial real estate industry through advocacy, education, research, standards and information.  Find BOMA online at www.boma.org.

Related Stories

Data Centers | Oct 26, 2020

Speed to market is biggest obstacle for burgeoning data center construction sector

Hyperscale and edge computing are driving growth in data center and mission critical facilities construction.

Adaptive Reuse | Oct 26, 2020

Mall property redevelopments could result in dramatic property value drops

Retail conversions to fulfillment centers, apartments, schools, or medical offices could cut values 60% to 90%.

Smart Buildings | Oct 26, 2020

World’s first smart building assessment and rating program released

The SPIRE Smart Building Program will help building owners and operators make better investment decisions, improve tenant satisfaction, and increase asset value.

Architects | Oct 14, 2020

The Weekly Show: AI for building facade inspections; designing a world-class architecture firm

The October 15 episode of BD+C's "The Weekly" is available for viewing on demand.

Coronavirus | Oct 8, 2020

The Weekly show: Statue of Liberty Museum, emotional learning in K-12, LA's climate change vulnerability

The October 8 episode of BD+C's "The Weekly" is available for viewing on demand.

Smart Buildings | Oct 1, 2020

Smart buildings stand on good data

The coming disruption of owning and operating a building and how to stay ahead through BIM.

Coronavirus | Sep 24, 2020

The Weekly show: Building optimization tech, the future of smart cities, and storm shelter design

The September 24 episode of BD+C's "The Weekly" is available for viewing on demand.

Healthcare Facilities | Sep 10, 2020

Easing the oncology journey: The role of urgent care

Oncology patients are better served when they’re connected to the right staff.

Airports | Sep 10, 2020

The Weekly show: Curtis Fentress, FAIA, on airport design, and how P3s are keeping university projects alive

The September 10 episode of BD+C's "The Weekly" is available for viewing on demand.

Giants 400 | Aug 28, 2020

2020 Giants 400 Report: Ranking the nation's largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms

The 2020 Giants 400 Report features more than 130 rankings across 25 building sectors and specialty categories.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category



Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.


halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021