KPMG, an organization of firms that provide audit, tax and advisory services, surveyed 100 U.S. building material manufacturing executives to understand what technological investments they had made—or were planning to make—and why.
These digital developments range from Building Information Management (BIM) integration to e-commerce and online delivery. Regardless of the method, KPMG pulled out four surprising insights from the results of the survey.
Overall, half of building product manufacturers plan to invest in one or more areas of technology in the next three years. The survey breaks down technology categories by product journey, from pre-sale, sale to shipping, operations, and post-sale groups. Pre-sale technology would include BIM systems and AR/VR design, for example.
![Technologies implemented by building materials manufacturers data graph](/sites/default/files/inline-images/Screen%20Shot%202023-05-04%20at%202.26.11%20PM.png)
1. Connected capabilities can work without ‘smart’ products
In the study, KPMG expected to see post-sale connected capabilities to only be applicable to smart products, such as thermostats, security systems, and air conditioners. However, 42% of respondents that have already implemented such connected capabilities have no products with any smart features.
Likewise, 67% of respondents who plan to implement these technologies in the next three years said the same.
![Share of revenue from "smart" products within companies that have implemented and plan to implement connected capabilities data graph](/sites/default/files/inline-images/Screen%20Shot%202023-05-04%20at%201.29.32%20PM.png)
2. Technology can drive both revenue and cost benefits
What are the largest influences behind implementing new technologies? Over half (56%) of building materials manufacturers report cost savings as one of the biggest reasons. Forty-two percent attribute their influence towards the labor/talent shortage, while 75% of manufacturers planning to implement new technologies do so for a competitive advantage.
Alternatively, one-quarter (26%) of respondents listed ESG concerns as an influence, and just 22% said that customers were requesting it. KPMG finds that the reasons did not differ significantly across company types or types of technology.
![Stated reasons for implementing new technologies data graph](/sites/default/files/inline-images/Screen%20Shot%202023-05-04%20at%201.44.47%20PM.png)
3. AR/VR technology is in addition to—not a replacement for—outreach teams
Rather than displacing the role of sales support teams, AR/VR tech was found to be an additional tool for architects, engineers, and consultant outreach teams. The survey shows that 78% of companies investing in AR/VR and remote monitoring to help the pre-sale process have a dedicated support team.
This is above the general average of 50% of respondents with the same teams, but without AR/VR technology in place, according to the report.
![Presence of pre-sale support teams at companies planning augmented or virtual reality implementations data graph](/sites/default/files/inline-images/Screen%20Shot%202023-05-04%20at%202.09.04%20PM.png)
4. Companies overestimate their technological sophistication levels
When asked about their companies’ technological maturity compared to competitors, a majority of respondents (70%) believe they are more advanced than average. Only 9% believe their company is below average, but no respondents claimed to be “the least advanced of all our competitors in digital maturity.”
Furthermore, KPMG saw that the more technologies a company selected as “implemented,” the more likely they were to self-rate as being above average or best-in-class.
![Building products manufacturer respondents self-rating of their companies' technological maturity data graph](/sites/default/files/inline-images/Screen%20Shot%202023-05-04%20at%202.21.28%20PM.png)
“While quantity certainly helps, quality of execution is a determining factor in how effective these technologies are,” says Serena Crivellaro and Len Prokopets, Managing Directors, Advisory, KPMG. “Unfortunately, with technological deployments being so broad-based across the industry, competitors may be more advanced than companies expect.”
Click here to view the entire report.
Related Stories
AEC Tech | Jul 15, 2019
Lack of standards hampers development of exoskeleton industry
Guidelines, common terminology, and testing methodology are needed, says expert.
AEC Tech | Jul 15, 2019
Investors eye startups focused on automating construction
Investors could reap big payoffs in an industry that experts say is ready for automation.
AEC Tech | Jul 12, 2019
A new Dodge-Viewpoint report gauges how well contractors gather and use jobsite data
Information is power, but are contractors collecting what they need to make better decisions?
| Jul 11, 2019
Pepper Construction is using 3D models to help identify underground utilities on jobsites
Overlaying new installs and site surveys add precision to the construction process.
AEC Tech | Jul 10, 2019
Blue Collar Labs launches Builder’s Almanac, an online construction technology evaluation platform
The free online resource aims to eliminate subjective bias from the contech software evaluation process.
AEC Tech | Jul 2, 2019
Living in a cloud: What nanotech means for architecture and the built environment
Could there come a time when buildings will become less about bricks and mortar and feel more like mists or fogs?
AEC Tech | Jun 28, 2019
In London, Autodesk homes in on construction management
The software goliath sounds the alarm about the urgent need for productivity improvements to address unbridled urbanization.
Giants 400 | Jun 26, 2019
How are the AEC Giants faring in the tech arms race?
About half (42%) say their firm is “on par” with their most-direct AEC competitors.
AEC Tech | Jun 10, 2019
Mortenson joins forces with robotics technology producer
The partners will focus on equipment used for earthmoving in wind and solar projects.
AEC Tech | May 15, 2019
AI and digital twin firm Reconstruct Inc. closing $7.7 million Series A investment
Reconstruct’s AI and digital twin capabilities provide indoor/outdoor views for project stakeholders to track and resolve project issues in a virtual environment before they impact cost and schedule.