You may be violating an employment law just by trying to be nice to your employees, says a new report.
The California Chamber of Commerce has produced a white paper cataloging the top 10 mistakes most likely to get a company sued. While a few of the laws cited apply specifically to California, some of them are federal and may apply in your state.
The report observes: "Employers may unintentionally violate employment laws simply by trying to provide some flexibility for an employee, save money for the company or just be nice."
Here are the top 10 mistakes:
1. Classifying all employees as exempt, whether they are or not
It may be easier to pay someone a salary rather than figure out overtime, meal breaks, rest breaks and the like. The time (and money) you save on bookkeeping is a false economy, however, since you could pay big time in penalties or a lawsuit. (See the report for more specifics.)
2. Letting employees work through lunch so they can take off early
A non-exempt employee is required to be given a 30-minute meal break, plus a 10-minute break for every four hours worked. If you deny one or the other, you owe the person an extra hour's wages; if you deny both in the same day, you owe an additional two hours. The wages must be paid during the pay period in which it's missed. The employee cannot waive his or her right to the breaks.
3. Making everyone an "independent contractor" because having employees is too much trouble
The report notes that contractors are happy until one of the following comes up: workers' compensation, unemployment insurance, state disability insurance or paid family leave benefits. Avoid these legal spiderwebs by determining who is and who isn't a contractor.
4. Not providing training about harassment and discrimination to managers and supervisors
Don't assume your employees won't need the information. Avoid lawsuits by providing the basic sexual harassment training required by law.
5. Letting employees decide which, and how many, hours they want to work each day
Most employees are restricted by law regarding the number of hours they can work without needing to be paid overtime. If you are allowing longer workdays for four-day workweeks, there are rules that need to be followed. Check with your state laws for specifics.
6. Terminating any employee who takes a leave of absence
From the report: "Employees have legal protection when they are away from work for various reasons, including workers' compensation, disability, pregnancy, family and medical leave, military leave, jury duty and many more."
7. Withholding an employee's final check if they fail to return company property
You may think you can withhold money while you wait for an employee to return a computer or a cellphone, but think again. Some states have laws that require you hand over the check the minute the words "you're fired" come out of your mouth. And if an employee quits and gives more than 72 hours notice, the check must be ready on his or her last day. The penalties start accruing from the moment the check is late-one day of wages for every calendar day of delay.
8. Providing loans to employees and deducting the money from their paycheck each pay period
This seems perfectly fine, doesn't it? Except most state labor codes permit only paycheck deductions authorized by law and those authorized by the employee for health insurance or other benefits. No other deductions are permitted. If you're making a loan, you should have the employee sign a promissory note and a lawyer review it.
9. Using noncompete agreements to protect confidential information
Many employers force employees to sign these agreements to protect business secrets, customer lists, and pricing information and to prevent employees from working for the competition. Essentially, you can't force your employee to stay with you, nor can you prevent him or her from making a living.
10. Implementing a "use it or lose it" vacation policy and avoid paying out all the money at termination
Accrued vacation is a form of wages and cannot be denied. You can stop an employee from accruing vacation beyond a "reasonable" amount, but you cannot take away what he or she has already earned. What is considered a "reasonable" cap? Generally 1.5 to two times the annual accrual, says the report.
Have you suffered any consequences from doing any of these things?
--
Courtney Rubin is a business writer and contributing editor to Inc. magazine.
Related Stories
Architects | May 8, 2018
WeWork names BIGās Ingels as its Chief Architect
Heāll be plenty busy working with a company that has aggressive growth ambitions.
Architects | May 8, 2018
Illinois Office of Tourism unveils new Frank Lloyd Wright Trail
The trail stretches from Rockford to Springfield.
Architects | May 3, 2018
Designing innovative solutions for chronic homelessness
Whatās stopping us from creating more Permanent Supportive Housing?Ā
Architects | Apr 27, 2018
4 reasons to pursue speaking engagements
We found speaking engagements were among the top ten marketing techniques that AEC firms employ.
Office Buildings | Apr 19, 2018
From fitness to bowling alleys: How commercial office buildings are differentiating themselves through amenities
HereĀ are five ways that amenities can help developers and building owners attract and secure tenants by appealing to their inhabitants.
Architects | Apr 19, 2018
Perkins Eastman and Dougherty announce intent to merge
Combined practice will create expanded capabilities for K-12, higher education projects in California.
Architects | Apr 17, 2018
Cannon Design expects merger with gkkworks will help streamline its deliveries
The combined firm reinforces its presence in the western U.S.
Architects | Apr 16, 2018
Is the AEC industry ready to shake off its retrograde image?
Technology has been and always will be perceived as a source for wonder and worry.
Architects | Apr 10, 2018
HOK names a physician as its new Chief Medical Officer
Dr. Andrew Ibrahim will collaborate with the firmās medical planning and design teams. Ā Ā
Architects | Apr 5, 2018
AIA grants $100,000 to four Upjohn Research Initiative projects
The purpose of the grant is to provide base funds for applied research projects that will advance the design professionās knowledge and practice.